Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;79(5):1415-1425.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1324-7.

Human classifier: Observers can deduce task solely from eye movements

Affiliations

Human classifier: Observers can deduce task solely from eye movements

Brett Bahle et al. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Computer classifiers have been successful at classifying various tasks using eye movement statistics. However, the question of human classification of task from eye movements has rarely been studied. Across two experiments, we examined whether humans could classify task based solely on the eye movements of other individuals. In Experiment 1, human classifiers were shown one of three sets of eye movements: Fixations, which were displayed as blue circles, with larger circles meaning longer fixation durations; Scanpaths, which were displayed as yellow arrows; and Videos, in which a neon green dot moved around the screen. There was an additional Scene manipulation in which eye movement properties were displayed either on the original scene where the task (Search, Memory, or Rating) was performed or on a black background in which no scene information was available. Experiment 2 used similar methods but only displayed Fixations and Videos with the same Scene manipulation. The results of both experiments showed successful classification of Search. Interestingly, Search was best classified in the absence of the original scene, particularly in the Fixation condition. Memory also was classified above chance with the strongest classification occurring with Videos in the presence of the scene. Additional analyses on the pattern of correct responses in these two conditions demonstrated which eye movement properties successful classifiers were using. These findings demonstrate conditions under which humans can extract information from eye movement characteristics in addition to providing insight into the relative success/failure of previous computer classifiers.

Keywords: Categorization; Cognitive; Eye movements; Visual search.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example stimuli for Experiment 1, with Fixations on the left, Scanpaths in the middle, and Videos on the right. The Scene condition is on top and the NoScene on bottom for all stimuli

References

    1. Borji A, & Itti L (2014). Defending Yarbus: Eye movements reveal observers’ task. Journal of Vision, 14, 1–22. - PubMed
    1. Borji A, Lennartz A, & Pomplun M (2015). What do eyes reveal about the mind?: Algorithmic inference of search targets from fixations. Neurocomputing, 149, 788–799.
    1. Caucci GM, & Kreuz RJ (2012). Social and paralinguistic cues to sarcasm. Humor, 25, 1–22.
    1. Dodd MD, Van der Stigchel S, & Hollingworth A (2009). Novelty is not always the best policy: Inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task. Psychological Science, 20, 333–339. - PubMed
    1. Einhäuser W, Rutishauser U, & Koch C (2008). Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli. Journal of Vision, 8, 1–19. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources