Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Sep;24(9):1165-1168.
doi: 10.1111/acem.13221. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

Validation of the No Objective Testing Rule and Comparison to the HEART Pathway

Jason P Stopyra  1 , Chadwick D Miller  1 , Brian C Hiestand  1 , Cedric W Lefebvre  1 , Bret A Nicks  1 , David M Cline  1 , Kim L Askew  1 , Robert F Riley  2 , Gregory B Russell  3 , James W Hoekstra  1 , Simon A Mahler  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Validation of the No Objective Testing Rule and Comparison to the HEART Pathway

Jason P Stopyra et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The no objective testing rule (NOTR) is a decision aid designed to safely identify emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain who do not require objective testing for coronary artery disease.

Objectives: The objective was to validate the NOTR in a cohort of U.S. ED patients with acute chest pain and compare its performance to the HEART Pathway.

Methods: A secondary analysis of 282 participants enrolled in the HEART Pathway randomized controlled trial was conducted. Each patient was classified as low risk or at risk by the NOTR. Sensitivity for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days was calculated in the entire study population. NOTR and HEART Pathways were compared among patients randomized to the HEART Pathway in the parent trial using McNemar's test and the net reclassification improvement (NRI).

Results: Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 22/282 (7.8%) participants, including no deaths, 16/282 (5.6%) with myocardial infarction (MI), and 6/282 (2.1%) with coronary revascularization without MI. NOTR was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 84.6%-100%) sensitive for MACE and identified 78/282 patients (27.7%, 95% = CI 22.5-33.3%) as low risk. In the HEART Pathway arm (n = 141), both NOTR and HEART Pathway identified all patients with MACE as at risk. Compared to NOTR, the HEART Pathway was able to correctly reclassify 27 patients without MACE as low risk, yielding a NRI of 20.8% (95% CI = 11.3%-30.2%).

Conclusions: Within a U.S. cohort of ED patients with chest pain, the NOTR and HEART Pathway were 100% sensitive for MACE at 30 days. However, the HEART Pathway identified more patients suitable for early discharge than the NOTR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • In Reply.
    Stopyra JP, Miller CD, Mahler SA. Stopyra JP, et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;24(9):1171-1172. doi: 10.1111/acem.13239. Epub 2017 Jul 31. Acad Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 28608431 No abstract available.
  • Comparing the No Objective Testing Rule to the HEART Pathway.
    Greenslade J, Cullen L. Greenslade J, et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;24(9):1169-1170. doi: 10.1111/acem.13240. Epub 2017 Jul 25. Acad Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 28608494 No abstract available.

References

    1. Hermann LK, Weingart SD, Duvall WL, Henzlova MJ. The limited utility of routine cardiac stress testing in emergency department chest pain patients younger than 40 years. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:12–6. - PubMed
    1. Owens PL, Barrett ML, Gibson TB, Andrews RM, Weinick RM, Mutter RL. Emergency department care in the United States: a profile of national data sources. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56:150–65. - PubMed
    1. Mahler SA, Riley RF, Hiestand BC, et al. The HEART Pathway randomized trial: identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge. Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2015;8:195–203. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenslade JH, Parsonage W, Than M, et al. A Clinical Decision Rule to Identify Emergency Department Patients at Low Risk for Acute Coronary Syndrome Who Do Not Need Objective Coronary Artery Disease Testing: The No Objective Testing Rule. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;67:478–89. e2. - PubMed
    1. Mahler SA, Miller CD, Hollander JE, et al. Identifying patients for early discharge: Performance of decision rules among patients with acute chest pain. Int J Cardiol. 2012 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types