Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;28(7):921-928.
doi: 10.1177/0956797617698226. Epub 2017 May 11.

Rapid Statistical Learning Supporting Word Extraction From Continuous Speech

Affiliations

Rapid Statistical Learning Supporting Word Extraction From Continuous Speech

Laura J Batterink. Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

The identification of words in continuous speech, known as speech segmentation, is a critical early step in language acquisition. This process is partially supported by statistical learning, the ability to extract patterns from the environment. Given that speech segmentation represents a potential bottleneck for language acquisition, patterns in speech may be extracted very rapidly, without extensive exposure. This hypothesis was examined by exposing participants to continuous speech streams composed of novel repeating nonsense words. Learning was measured on-line using a reaction time task. After merely one exposure to an embedded novel word, learners demonstrated significant learning effects, as revealed by faster responses to predictable than to unpredictable syllables. These results demonstrate that learners gained sensitivity to the statistical structure of unfamiliar speech on a very rapid timescale. This ability may play an essential role in early stages of language acquisition, allowing learners to rapidly identify word candidates and "break in" to an unfamiliar language.

Keywords: language acquisition; open data; open materials; reaction time; speech segmentation; statistical learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author declared that she had no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship or the publication of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Stimulus design (a) and example trial sequence (b). Each speech stream was composed of a randomly selected subset of 12 syllables drawn without replacement from a pool of 24 syllables. These 12 syllables were then randomly distributed to create four trisyllabic words, which were repeated four times each. The resulting 16 words (48 syllables) were concatenated together in pseudorandom order and presented aurally without any pauses between them. Before each stream was played, participants saw and heard a target syllable and were asked to identify it as quickly as possible every time it occurred in the stream.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Reaction time (RT) data as a function of triplet position (first, second, or third syllable in the word) and word presentation (first, second, third, or fourth occurrence of the word in the stream). Overall mean RT is shown in (a). Mean RT predicted by main effects of interest (triplet position, word presentation, and their interaction), controlling for the effect of overall syllable position in the stream, is shown in (b). Error bars represent ±1 SEM.

References

    1. Batterink L. J., Reber P. J., Neville H. J., Paller K. A. (2015). Implicit and explicit contributions to statistical learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 62–78. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Batterink L. J., Reber P. J., Paller K. A. (2015). Functional differences between statistical learning with and without explicit training. Learning & Memory, 22, 544–556. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cockcroft K. (2002). Language development. In Hook D., Watts J., Cockcroft K. (Eds.), Developmental psychology (pp. 218–232). Lansdowne, South Africa: UCT Press.
    1. Franco A., Eberlen J., Destrebecqz A., Cleeremans A., Bertels J. (2015). Rapid serial auditory presentation segmentation: A new measure of statistical learning in speech segmentation. Experimental Psychology, 62, 346–351. - PubMed
    1. French R. M., Addyman C., Mareschal D. (2011). TRACX: A recognition-based connectionist framework for the sequence segmentation and chunk extraction. Psychological Review, 118, 614–636. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources