Treatment Decision Regret Among Long-Term Survivors of Localized Prostate Cancer: Results From the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study
- PMID: 28493812
- PMCID: PMC5501361
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.6317
Treatment Decision Regret Among Long-Term Survivors of Localized Prostate Cancer: Results From the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study
Abstract
Purpose To determine the demographic, clinical, decision-making, and quality-of-life factors that are associated with treatment decision regret among long-term survivors of localized prostate cancer. Patients and Methods We evaluated men who were age ≤ 75 years when diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between October 1994 and October 1995 in one of six SEER tumor registries and who completed a 15-year follow-up survey. The survey obtained demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical data and measured treatment decision regret, informed decision making, general- and disease-specific quality of life, health worry, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concern, and outlook on life. We used multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with regret. Results We surveyed 934 participants, 69.3% of known survivors. Among the cohort, 59.1% had low-risk tumor characteristics (PSA < 10 ng/mL and Gleason score < 7), and 89.2% underwent active treatment. Overall, 14.6% expressed treatment decision regret: 8.2% of those whose disease was managed conservatively, 15.0% of those who received surgery, and 16.6% of those who underwent radiotherapy. Factors associated with regret on multivariable analysis included reporting moderate or big sexual function bother (reported by 39.0%; OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.51 to 5.0), moderate or big bowel function bother (reported by 7.7%; OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.04 to 5.15), and PSA concern (mean score 52.8; OR, 1.01 per point change; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.02). Increasing age at diagnosis and report of having made an informed treatment decision were inversely associated with regret. Conclusion Regret was a relatively infrequently reported outcome among long-term survivors of localized prostate cancer; however, our results suggest that better informing men about treatment options, in particular, conservative treatment, might help mitigate long-term regret. These findings are timely for men with low-risk cancers who are being encouraged to consider active surveillance.
Comment in
-
Re: Treatment Decision Regret among Long-Term Survivors of Localized Prostate Cancer: Results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.J Urol. 2017 Nov;198(5):980-983. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.08.034. Epub 2017 Aug 9. J Urol. 2017. PMID: 29059774 No abstract available.
-
Re: Treatment Decision Regret among Long-Term Survivors of Localized Prostate Cancer: Results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.J Urol. 2017 Dec;198(6):1200. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.058. Epub 2017 Sep 14. J Urol. 2017. PMID: 29144930 No abstract available.
References
-
- Hoffman RM, Penson DF, Zietman AL, et al. Comparative effectiveness research in localized prostate cancer treatment. J Comp Eff Res. 2013;2:583–593. - PubMed
-
- Chou R, Croswell JM, Dana T, et al. Screening for prostate cancer: A review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:762–771. - PubMed
-
- Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Rutks I, et al. Systematic review: Comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:435–448. - PubMed
-
- Lin GA, Aaronson DS, Knight SJ, et al. Patient decision aids for prostate cancer treatment: A systematic review of the literature. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:379–390. - PubMed
-
- Carvalhal GF, Smith DS, Ramos C, et al. Correlates of dissatisfaction with treatment in patients with prostate cancer diagnosed through screening. J Urol. 1999;162:113–118. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous