Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0177306.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177306. eCollection 2017.

Taking stock of the social determinants of health: A scoping review

Affiliations

Taking stock of the social determinants of health: A scoping review

Kelsey Lucyk et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: In recent decades, the social determinants of health (SDOH) has gained increasing prominence as a foundational concept for population and public health in academic literature and policy documents, internationally. However, alongside its widespread dissemination, and in light of multiple conceptual models, lists, and frameworks, some dilution and confusion is apparent. This scoping review represents an attempt to take stock of SDOH literature in the context of contemporary population and public health.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review to synthesize and map SDOH literature, informed by the methods of Arksey and O'Malley (2005). We searched 5 academic and 3 grey literature databases for "social determinants of health" and "population health" or "public health" or "health promotion," published 2004-2014. We also conducted a search on "inequity" or "inequality" or "disparity" or "social gradient" and "Canad*" to ensure that we captured articles where this language was used to discuss the SDOH. We included articles that discussed SDOH in depth, either explicitly or in implicit but nuanced ways. We hand-searched reference lists to further identify relevant articles.

Findings: Our synthesis of 108 articles showed wide variation by study setting, target audience, and geographic scope, with most articles published in an academic setting, by Canadian authors, for policy-maker audiences. SDOH were communicated by authors as a list, model, or story; each with strengths and weaknesses. Thematic analysis identified one theme: health equity as an overarching and binding concept to the SDOH. Health equity was understood in different ways with implications for action on the SDOH.

Conclusions: Among the vast SDOH literature, there is a need to identify and clearly articulate the essence and implications of the SDOH concept. We recommend that authors be intentional in their efforts to present and discuss SDOH to ensure that they speak to its foundational concept of health equity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Visual representation of approach to inclusion criteria.
The conceptual search strategy used to capture various bodies of literature.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Flow diagram for search of SDOH literature for exclusion reasons.
PRISMA diagram showing search and selection process of literature review.

References

    1. Gostin LO. Public Health Law: Power, Duty, Restraint Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2008.
    1. Labonte R, Polanyi M, Muhajarine N, McIntosh T, Williams A. Beyond the divides: towards critical population health research. Crit Public Health. 2005;15(1):5–17.
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada. What is the population health approach? 2004 [cited 2016 March 20]. Available from: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ph-sp/approach-approche/appr-eng.php.
    1. Dunn J, Hayes M. Toward a lexicon of population health. Can J Public Health. 1999;90(S1):S7–S10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Health Promotion [cited 2016 October 13]. Available from: http://www.who.int/topics/health_promotion/en/.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources