[Regulatory effect of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on polarization of macrophages]
- PMID: 28494546
- DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2017.04.008
[Regulatory effect of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on polarization of macrophages]
Abstract
Objective: To examine the regulatory effect of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) on the polarization of bone marrow-derived macrophages, and to provide a theoretical support for the application of mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of liver fibrosis. Methods: MSCs and macrophages were first isolated from the bone marrow of mice. Macrophages were polarized to M1 macrophages with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and to M2 macrophages with interleukin-4 (IL-4). The macrophages were then co-cultured with BM-MSCs in a Transwell for 24 h, and changes in the percentages of M1 and M2 macrophages were examined using flow cytometry. The mRNA levels of the M1 macrophage-associated cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-23a (IL-23a), and M2 macrophage-associated molecules, arginase-1 (Arg-1) and CD163, were measured by real-time quantitative PCR. The two samples were compared using the t test, and P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: Flow cytometry showed that the percentage of M1 macrophages was significantly lower in the (macrophage + LPS + IFN-γ + BM-MSC) co-culture group than in the (macrophage + LPS + IFN-γ) group (62.5% ± 4.6% vs 86.6% ± 6.9%, t = 5.034, P = 0.0073). In addition, the relative mRNA expression of TNF-α and IL-23a was also significantly reduced in the co-culture group compared with those in the macrophage control group as measured by RT-qPCR (t = 11.57 and 10.57, respectively, P < 0.05). Compared with that in the macrophage control group, the percentage of M2 macrophages in the (macrophage+BM-MSC) co-culture group was significantly increased (89.5% ± 5.8% vs 70.1% ± 6.3%, t = 3.924, P = 0.0172), along with significantly elevated relative mRNA expression of Arg1 (14.35±1.05 vs 1.00±0.03, t = 21.96, P < 0.05) and CD163 (3.04 ± 0.27 vs 1.00 ± 0.03, t = 13.14, P < 0.05). Conclusion: BM-MSCs can inhibit LPS + IFN-γ-induced polarization to M1 macrophages and promote polarization to M2 macrophages through the release of paracrine factors.
目的: 探索骨髓间充质干细胞(BM-MSC)对骨髓来源巨噬细胞极化的影响,为间充质干细胞治疗肝纤维化提供理论依据。 方法: 分别分离小鼠BM-MSC和骨髓来源巨噬细胞,用脂多糖(LPS)和干扰素γ(IFNγ)或白细胞介素4(IL-4)刺激巨噬细胞向M1或M2型巨噬细胞极化。利用Transwell小室建立BM-MSC和巨噬细胞非接触式共培养体系,通过流式细胞术分析共培养后,M1型巨噬细胞和M2型巨噬细胞比例变化情况,通过荧光定量PCR检测M1型巨噬细胞相关分子肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFα)、白细胞介素23a(IL-23a)和M2型巨噬细胞相关分子精氨酸酶1(Arg1)、CD163表达量的变化。两样本比较采用t检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 结果: 巨噬细胞+ LPS + IFNγ+ BM-MSC共培养组与巨噬细胞+ LPS+IFNγ组比较,M1型巨噬细胞比例显著降低(62.5%±4.6%对比86.6%±6.9%,t = 5.034,P = 0.0073),差异有统计学意义;且M1型巨噬细胞相关分子TNFα相对表达量(3.75±0.23对比6.17±0.27)和IL-23a相对表达量(2.05±0.16对比4.56±0.37),均明显降低,t值分别为11.57、10.57,P值均< 0.05,差异均具有统计学意义。巨噬细胞+ BM-MSC共培养组与巨噬细胞单独培养组相比,M2型巨噬细胞比例显著增高(89.5%±5.8%对比70.1%±6.3%,t = 3.924,P = 0.0172),差异有统计学意义;且M2型巨噬细胞相关分子Arg1相对表达量(14.35±1.05对比1.00±0.03)和CD163相对表达量(3.04±0.27对比1.00±0.03)均显著增高,t值分别为21.96、13.14,P值均< 0.05,差异均具有统计学意义。 结论: BM-MSC可通过旁分泌作用抑制巨噬细胞由LPS + IFNγ诱导的M1型极化,促进巨噬细胞向M2型极化。.
Keywords: Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; Liver cirrhosis; Macrophage polarization.
Similar articles
-
Preconditioning of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells highly strengthens their potential to promote IL-6-dependent M2b polarization.Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018 Oct 25;9(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-1039-2. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018. PMID: 30359316 Free PMC article.
-
Preconditioning of murine mesenchymal stem cells synergistically enhanced immunomodulation and osteogenesis.Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017 Dec 6;8(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0730-z. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017. PMID: 29212557 Free PMC article.
-
[Adipose-derived stem cells promote the polarization from M1 macrophages to M2 macrophages].Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Mar;32(3):332-8. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016. PMID: 26927552 Chinese.
-
Macrophage Polarization: Different Gene Signatures in M1(LPS+) vs. Classically and M2(LPS-) vs. Alternatively Activated Macrophages.Front Immunol. 2019 May 24;10:1084. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01084. eCollection 2019. Front Immunol. 2019. PMID: 31178859 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Anti-inflammatory and M2 macrophage polarization-promoting effect of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes.Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 Aug;97:107823. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107823. Epub 2021 Jun 5. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021. PMID: 34102486 Review.
Cited by
-
Coupling between Osseointegration and Mechanotransduction to Maintain Foreign Body Equilibrium in the Long-Term: A Comprehensive Overview.J Clin Med. 2019 Jan 25;8(2):139. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020139. J Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 30691022 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Review of Recent Developments in the Molecular Mechanisms of Bone Healing.Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jan 14;22(2):767. doi: 10.3390/ijms22020767. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID: 33466612 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Osteoimmunology drives dental implant osseointegration: A new paradigm for implant dentistry.Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2021 Nov;57:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Feb 16. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2021. PMID: 33737990 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Modulating macrophage activities to promote endogenous bone regeneration: Biological mechanisms and engineering approaches.Bioact Mater. 2020 Aug 22;6(1):244-261. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.012. eCollection 2021 Jan. Bioact Mater. 2020. PMID: 32913932 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mesenchymal stem cell-secreted extracellular vesicles carrying TGF-β1 up-regulate miR-132 and promote mouse M2 macrophage polarization.J Cell Mol Med. 2020 Nov;24(21):12750-12764. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15860. Epub 2020 Sep 23. J Cell Mol Med. 2020. PMID: 32965772 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous