Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Sep 15;11(5):604-611.
doi: 10.5009/gnl16178.

Endoscopic Management of Peri-Pancreatic Fluid Collections

Affiliations
Review

Endoscopic Management of Peri-Pancreatic Fluid Collections

Hon Chi Yip et al. Gut Liver. .

Abstract

In the past decade, there has been a progressive paradigm shift in the management of peri-pancreatic fluid collections after acute pancreatitis. Refinements in the definitions of fluid collections from the updated Atlanta classification have enabled better communication amongst physicians in an effort to formulate optimal treatments. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts has emerged as the procedure of choice over surgical cystogastrostomy. The approach provides similar success rates with low complications and better quality of life compared with surgery. However, an endoscopic "step up" approach in the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis has also been advocated. Both endoscopic and percutaneous drainage routes may be used depending on the anatomical location of the collections. New-generation large diameter EUS-specific stent systems have also recently been described. The device allows precise and effective drainage of the collections and permits endoscopic necrosectomy through the stents.

Keywords: Endoscopic necrosectomy; Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pseudocyst drainage; Endosonography; Pancreatic necrosis; Pancreatic pseudocyst.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Evolution of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic fluid collections. EUS, endoscopic ultrasound; SEMS, self-expanding metallic stents; NC, nasocystic catheter.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Computed tomography of (A) pancreatic pseudocyst and (B) walled-off pancreatic necrosis.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Endoscopic appearance of an infected pseudocyst after two double pigtail stents were placed.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(A) Transgastric and (B) percutaneous necrosectomy.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Drainage with a forward viewing echoendoscope.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Endoscopic ultrasound-specific stent systems: (A) NAGI stent, (B) Spaxus stent, and (C) Hot AXIOS stent.

References

    1. Kourtesis G, Wilson SE, Williams RA. The clinical significance of fluid collections in acute pancreatitis. Am Surg. 1990;56:796–799. - PubMed
    1. Diculescu M, Ciocîrlan M, Ciocîrlan M, Stănescu D, Ciprut T, Marinescu T. Predictive factors for pseudocysts and peripancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis. Rom J Gastroenterol. 2005;14:129–134. - PubMed
    1. London NJ, Neoptolemos JP, Lavelle J, Bailey I, James D. Serial computed tomography scanning in acute pancreatitis: a prospective study. Gut. 1989;30:397–403. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.3.397. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cui ML, Kim KH, Kim HG, et al. Incidence, risk factors and clinical course of pancreatic fluid collections in acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:1055–1062. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2967-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rogers BH, Cicurel NJ, Seed RW. Transgastric needle aspiration of pancreatic pseudocyst through an endoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 1975;21:133–134. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(75)73821-X. - DOI - PubMed