Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 12;13(1):26.
doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0249-1.

Gender blind? An analysis of global public-private partnerships for health

Sarah Hawkes  1 , Kent Buse  2 , Anuj Kapilashrami  3
Affiliations

Gender blind? An analysis of global public-private partnerships for health

Sarah Hawkes et al. Global Health. .

Abstract

Background: The Global Public Private Partnerships for Health (GPPPH) constitute an increasingly central part of the global health architecture and carry both financial and normative power. Gender is an important determinant of health status, influencing differences in exposure to health determinants, health behaviours, and the response of the health system. We identified 18 GPPPH - defined as global institutions with a formal governance mechanism which includes both public and private for-profit sector actors - and conducted a gender analysis of each.

Results: Gender was poorly mainstreamed through the institutional functioning of the partnerships. Half of these partnerships had no mention of gender in their overall institutional strategy and only three partnerships had a specific gender strategy. Fifteen governing bodies had more men than women - up to a ratio of 5:1. Very few partnerships reported sex-disaggregated data in their annual reports or coverage/impact results. The majority of partnerships focused their work on maternal and child health and infectious and communicable diseases - none addressed non-communicable diseases (NCDs) directly, despite the strong role that gender plays in determining risk for the major NCD burdens.

Conclusions: We propose two areas of action in response to these findings. First, GPPPH need to become serious in how they "do" gender; it needs to be mainstreamed through the regular activities, deliverables and systems of accountability. Second, the entire global health community needs to pay greater attention to tackling the major burden of NCDs, including addressing the gendered nature of risk. Given the inherent conflicts of interest in tackling the determinants of many NCDs, it is debatable whether the emergent GPPPH model will be an appropriate one for addressing NCDs.

Keywords: Gender; Global public private partnerships for health; Mainstreaming; Non-communicable diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
DALY distribution and GPPPH area of work; men. Data and chart available at: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
DALY distribution and GPPPH area of work; women. Data and chart available at: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bovaird T. Public-private partnerships: From contested concepts to prevalent practice. Int Rev Adm Sci. 2004;70(2):199–215. doi: 10.1177/0020852304044250. - DOI
    1. Ciccone DK. Arguing for centralized coordination solution to the public-private partnership explosion in global health. Glob Health Promot. 2010;17(2):48–51. doi: 10.1177/1757975910365224. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosenau PV. Public-private policy partnerships. Cambridge: MIT Press.; 2000.
    1. McCoy D, Chand S, Sridhar D. Global Health Funding: how much, where it comes from and where it goes. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24(6):407–17. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Maximizing Positive Synergies Collaborative Group An assessment of interactions between global health initiatives and country health systems. Lancet. 2009;373:1237–2169. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60710-8. - DOI - PubMed