Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Sep;124(9):1259-1270.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.052. Epub 2017 May 7.

United States Multicenter Clinical Trial of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Keratoconus Treatment

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

United States Multicenter Clinical Trial of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Keratoconus Treatment

Peter S Hersh et al. Ophthalmology. 2017 Sep.

Erratum in

  • Corrigendum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Ophthalmology. 2017 Dec;124(12):1878. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.014. Ophthalmology. 2017. PMID: 29157430 No abstract available.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) for the treatment of progressive keratoconus.

Design: Prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled clinical trial.

Participants: Patients with progressive keratoconus (n = 205).

Methods: The treatment group underwent standard CXL and the sham control group received riboflavin alone without removal of the epithelium.

Main outcome measures: The primary efficacy criterion was the change over 1 year of topography-derived maximum keratometry value, comparing treatment with control group. Secondary outcomes evaluated were corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent, endothelial cell count, and adverse events.

Results: In the CXL treatment group, the maximum keratometry value decreased by 1.6 diopters (D) from baseline to 1 year, whereas keratoconus continued to progress in the control group. In the treatment group, the maximum keratometry value decreased by 2.0 D or more in 28 eyes (31.5%) and increased by 2.0 D or more in 5 eyes (5.6%). The CDVA improved by an average of 5.7 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units. Twenty-three eyes (27.7%) gained and 5 eyes lost (6.0%) 10 logMAR or more. The UDVA improved 4.4 logMAR. Corneal haze was the most frequently reported CXL-related adverse finding. There were no significant changes in endothelial cell count 1 year after treatment.

Conclusions: Corneal collagen crosslinking was effective in improving the maximum keratometry value, CDVA, and UCVA in eyes with progressive keratoconus 1 year after treatment, with an excellent safety profile. Corneal collagen crosslinking affords the keratoconic patient an important new option to decrease progression of this ectatic corneal process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms