Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Jun;5(6):e593-e603.
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30184-5.

Community engagement and integrated health and polio immunisation campaigns in conflict-affected areas of Pakistan: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Community engagement and integrated health and polio immunisation campaigns in conflict-affected areas of Pakistan: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Muhammad Atif Habib et al. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Jun.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Pakistan faces huge challenges in eradicating polio due to widespread poliovirus transmission and security challenges. Innovative interventions are urgently needed to strengthen community buy-in, to increase the coverage of oral polio vaccine (OPV) and other routine immunisations, and to enhance immunity through the introduction of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) in combination with OPV. We aimed to evaluate the acceptability and effect on immunisation coverage of an integrated strategy for community engagement and maternal and child health immunisation campaigns in insecure and conflict-affected polio-endemic districts of Pakistan.

Methods: We did a community-based three-arm cluster randomised trial in healthy children aged 1 month to 5 years that resided within the study sites in three districts of Pakistan at high risk of polio. Clusters were randomly assigned by a computer algorithm using restricted randomisation in blocks of 20 by an external statistician (1:1:1) to receive routine polio programme activities (control, arm A), additional interventions with community outreach and mobilisation using an enhanced communication package and provision of short-term preventive maternal and child health services and routine immunisation (health camps), including OPV (arm B), or all interventions of arm B with additional provision of IPV delivered at the maternal and child health camps (arm C). An independent team conducted surveys at baseline, endline, and after each round of supplementary immunisation activity for acceptability and effect. The primary outcome measures for the study were coverage of OPV, IPV, and routine extended programme on immunisation vaccines and changes in the proportion of unvaccinated and fully vaccinated children. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01908114.

Findings: Between June 4, 2013, and May 31, 2014, 387 clusters were randomised (131 to arm A, 127 to arm B, and 129 to arm C). At baseline, 28 760 children younger than 5 years were recorded in arm A, 30 098 in arm B, and 29 126 in arm C. 359 clusters remained in the trial until the end (116 in arm A, 120 in arm B, and 123 in arm C; with 23 334 children younger than 5 years in arm A, 26 110 in arm B, and 25 745 in arm C). The estimated OPV coverage was 75% in arm A compared with 82% in arm B (difference vs arm A 6·6%; 95% CI 4·8-8·3) and 84% in arm C (8·5%, 6·8-10·1; overall p<0·0001). The mean proportion of routine vaccine doses received by children younger than 24 months of age was 43% in arm A, 52% in arm B (9%, 7-11) and 54% in arm C (11%, 9-13; overall p<0·0001). No serious adverse events requiring hospitalisation were reported after immunisation.

Interpretation: Despite the challenges associated with the polio end-game in high-risk, conflict-affected areas of Pakistan, a strategy of community mobilisation and targeted community-based health and immunisation camps during polio immunisation campaigns was successful in increasing vaccine coverage, including polio vaccine coverage.

Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Map of Pakistan showing study areas FATA=Federally Administered Tribal Areas. KPK=Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. AJK=Azad Jammu and Kashmir.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trial profile
Figure 3
Figure 3
OPV coverage by rounds OPV=oral polio vaccine. IPV=inactivated polio vaccine.

Comment in

References

    1. Global Polio Eradication Initiative Data and monitoring. Polio this week: wild poliovirus list. http://polioeradication.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/WPV_2011-2016_28D... (accessed Dec 28, 2016).
    1. National Institute of Population Studies (NIPS) [Pakistan] and ICF International . Pakistan demographic and health survey 2012–13. Demographic and Health Surveys. NIPS and ICF International; Islamabad, Pakistan, and Calverton, Maryland, USA: 2013. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR290/FR290.pdf (accessed Dec 28, 2016).
    1. Government of Pakistan National Emergency Action Plan for Polio eradication 2015–2016. http://www.polioeradication.org/Portals/0/Document/InfectedCountries/Pak... (accessed April 26, 2016).
    1. SteelFisher GK, Blendon RJ, Guirguis S. Threats to polio eradication in high-conflict areas in Pakistan and Nigeria: a polling study of caregivers of children younger than 5 years. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:1183–1192. - PubMed
    1. Habib MA, Soofi SB, Ali N. Knowledge and perceptions of polio and polio immunization in polio high-risk areas of Pakistan. J Public Health Policy. 2017 published online Jan 11. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data