Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun:86:140-152.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.024. Epub 2017 May 8.

Improving core outcome set development: qualitative interviews with developers provided pointers to inform guidance

Elizabeth Gargon  1 , Paula R Williamson  1 , Bridget Young  2
Affiliations

Improving core outcome set development: qualitative interviews with developers provided pointers to inform guidance

Elizabeth Gargon et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of the study was to explore core outcome set (COS) developers' experiences of their work to inform methodological guidance on COS development and identify areas for future methodological research.

Study design and setting: Semistructured, audio-recorded interviews with a purposive sample of 32 COS developers. Analysis of transcribed interviews was informed by the constant comparative method and framework analysis.

Results: Developers found COS development to be challenging, particularly in relation to patient participation and accessing funding. Their accounts raised fundamental questions about the status of COS development and whether it is consultation or research. Developers emphasized how the absence of guidance had affected their work and identified areas where guidance or evidence about COS development would be useful including, patient participation, ethics, international development, and implementation. They particularly wanted guidance on systematic reviews, Delphi, and consensus meetings.

Conclusion: The findings raise important questions about the funding, status, and process of COS development and indicate ways that it could be strengthened. Guidance could help developers to strengthen their work, but over specification could threaten quality in COS development. Guidance should therefore highlight common issues to consider and encourage tailoring of COS development to the context and circumstances of particular COS.

Keywords: Consensus; Core outcome sets; Delphi; Interview; Outcomes; Qualitative research; Research methodology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Five key steps of framework analysis.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Participant selection and recruitment. *One participant did not give a reason for declining, and the other participant was “over committed.”
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chalmers I., Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374:86–89. - PubMed
    1. Hirsch B.R., Califf R.M., Cheng S.K., Tasneem A., Horton J., Chiswell K. Characteristics of oncology clinical trials: insights from a systematic analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:972–979. - PubMed
    1. Miyar J., Adams C.E. Content and quality of 10,000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 60 years. Schizophr Bull. 2013;39:226–229. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hutton J.L., Williamson P.R. Bias in meta-analysis due to outcome variable selection within studies. Appl Stat. 2000;49:359–370.
    1. Dwan K., Altman D.G., Arnaiz J.A., Bloom J., Chan A.-W., Cronin E. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One [Electronic Resource] 2008;3:e3081. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources