The antifungal pipeline: a reality check
- PMID: 28496146
- PMCID: PMC5760994
- DOI: 10.1038/nrd.2017.46
The antifungal pipeline: a reality check
Abstract
Invasive fungal infections continue to appear in record numbers as the immunocompromised population of the world increases, owing partially to the increased number of individuals who are infected with HIV and partially to the successful treatment of serious underlying diseases. The effectiveness of current antifungal therapies - polyenes, flucytosine, azoles and echinocandins (as monotherapies or in combinations for prophylaxis, or as empiric, pre-emptive or specific therapies) - in the management of these infections has plateaued. Although these drugs are clinically useful, they have several limitations, such as off-target toxicity, and drug-resistant fungi are now emerging. New antifungals are therefore needed. In this Review, I discuss the robust and dynamic antifungal pipeline, including results from preclinical academic efforts through to pharmaceutical industry products, and describe the targets, strategies, compounds and potential outcomes.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares competing interests: see Web version for details.
Figures


References
-
- Brown GD, Denning DW, Levitz SM. Tackling human fungal infections. Science. 2012;336:647. This work reviews the current magnitude of issues relating to invasive fungal infections. - PubMed
-
- Park BJ, et al. Estimation of the current global burden of cryptococcal meningitis among persons living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS. 2009;23:525–530. - PubMed
-
- Galgiani JN, et al. 2016 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) clinical practice guideline for the treatment of coccidioidomycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:e112–e146. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources