Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Apr;6(2):163-168.
doi: 10.21037/gs.2016.09.12.

Silicone breast implant rupture: a review

Christopher Hillard  1 , Jason D Fowler  1 , Ruth Barta  1 , Bruce Cunningham  1
Affiliations
Review

Silicone breast implant rupture: a review

Christopher Hillard et al. Gland Surg. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Silicone breast implants have been in use for nearly 6 decades. In this time they have undergone significant changes in design and use. They have been subject to intense scrutiny with regard to safety and efficacy, including an almost 10 years moratorium on their use. The current generations of implants have been followed via the manufacturer's Core studies in order to obtain long term data regarding safety and complications. The results of the more recent studies are compiled in this review. Rupture rates are initially very low and begin to increase after 6-8 years of implantation. Implant rupture may be detected by physical exam, ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The majority of silicone implant ruptures are clinically undetectable. Symptomatic patients may present with capsular contracture, breast lumps or changes in breast shape. The most common cause of implant rupture is instrument damage during placement. Implant rupture may be confined to the peri-prosthetic capsule or may extravasate into the breast tissue. Patients with ruptured implants have been studied closely and the consensus of the literature states there are no health risks associated with implant rupture. Symptomatic patients with ruptured implants should be offered the choice of observation, or explantation and capsulectomy with or without replacement.

Keywords: Implant; rupture; silicone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Cunningham has served as a consultant for the Mentor Corporation, Acelity, and his university has received research grants in the past from Mentor and Allergan, and Sientra. And other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Variations of implant rupture. (A) Intact 1st generation implant with evidence of gel “bleed”; (B) ruptured second generation implant with free silicone leak; (C) intracapsular rupture of silicone implant in a patient who presented with a breast lump.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of second generation implant with intra-capsular rupture, there is free silicone liquid within the capsule.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cronin TD, Gerow FJ. Augmentation mammoplasty: A new ‘natural feel’ prosthesis. Transections of the Third International Congress of Plastic Surgery, Amsterdam. Excerpta Medical 1964:41–9.
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Regulatory History of Breast Implants in the U.S. Available online: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/Implantsa...
    1. Cronin TD, Greenberg RL. Our experiences with the silastic gel breast prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1970;46:1-7. 10.1097/00006534-197046010-00001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peters W, Pritzker K, Smith D, et al. Capsular calcification associated with silicone breast implants: incidence, determinants, and characterization. Ann Plast Surg 1998;41:348-60. 10.1097/00000637-199810000-00002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Collis N, Sharpe DT. Silicone gel-filled breast implant integrity: a retrospective review of 478 consecutively explanted implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:1979-85; discussion 1986-9. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources