Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Apr 27:7:83.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00083. eCollection 2017.

Data-Based Radiation Oncology: Design of Clinical Trials in the Toxicity Biomarkers Era

Affiliations
Review

Data-Based Radiation Oncology: Design of Clinical Trials in the Toxicity Biomarkers Era

David Azria et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

The ability to stratify patients using a set of biomarkers, which predict that toxicity risk would allow for radiotherapy (RT) modulation and serve as a valuable tool for precision medicine and personalized RT. For patients presenting with tumors with a low risk of recurrence, modifying RT schedules to avoid toxicity would be clinically advantageous. Indeed, for the patient at low risk of developing radiation-associated toxicity, use of a hypofractionated protocol could be proposed leading to treatment time reduction and a cost-utility advantage. Conversely, for patients predicted to be at high risk for toxicity, either a more conformal form or a new technique of RT, or a multidisciplinary approach employing surgery could be included in the trial design to avoid or mitigate RT when the potential toxicity risk may be higher than the risk of disease recurrence. In addition, for patients at high risk of recurrence and low risk of toxicity, dose escalation, such as a greater boost dose, or irradiation field extensions could be considered to improve local control without severe toxicities, providing enhanced clinical benefit. In cases of high risk of toxicity, tumor control should be prioritized. In this review, toxicity biomarkers with sufficient evidence for clinical testing are presented. In addition, clinical trial designs and predictive models are described for different clinical situations.

Keywords: biomarkers; patient selection; radiotherapy; toxicity tests; trial design.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, Cola L, Goitein M, Munzenrider JE, et al. Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (1991) 21:109–22.10.1016/0360-3016(91)90171-Y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bentzen SM, Constine LS, Deasy JO, Eisbruch A, Jackson A, Marks LB, et al. Quantitative analyses of normal tissue effects in the clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2010) 76:S3–9.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, Stein K, Mariotto A, Smith T, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin (2012) 62:220–41.10.3322/caac.21149 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holthusen H. Erfahrungen über die verträglichkeitsgrenze für röntgenstrahlen und deren nutzanwendung zur verhütung von schäden. Strahlentherapie (1936) 57:254–69.
    1. Burnet NG, Johansen J, Turesson I, Nyman J, Peacock JH. Describing patients’ normal tissue reactions: concerning the possibility of individualising radiotherapy dose prescriptions based on potential predictive assays of normal tissue radiosensitivity. Int J Cancer (1998) 79:606–13.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19981218)79:6<606:AID-IJC9>3.0.CO;2-Y - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources