Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Sep 1;56(9):1498-1509.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex174.

Sustained efficacy, safety and patient-reported outcomes of certolizumab pegol in axial spondyloarthritis: 4-year outcomes from RAPID-axSpA

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Sustained efficacy, safety and patient-reported outcomes of certolizumab pegol in axial spondyloarthritis: 4-year outcomes from RAPID-axSpA

Désirée van der Heijde et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). .

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol over 4 years of continuous treatment in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), including both AS and non-radiographic (nr-) axSpA.

Methods: RAPID-axSpA was a phase 3 randomized trial, double blind and placebo controlled to week 24, dose blind to week 48 and open label to week 204. Patients had a clinical diagnosis of axSpA, meeting Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria, and had active disease. The assessed outcomes included ASAS20, ASAS40, AS DAS (ASDAS), BASDAI, BASFI and BASMI scores, along with selected measures of remission. Further patient-reported outcomes, peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, uveitis and quality-of-life measures are also reported.

Results: Two hundred and eighteen of 325 patients randomized (AS: 121; nr-axSpA: 97) received certolizumab pegol from week 0. Of these, 65% remained in the study at week 204 (AS: 67%; nr-axSpA: 63%). Across all outcomes, for AS and nr-axSpA, sustained improvements were observed to week 204 [week 204 overall axSpA: ASAS20: 54.1% (non-responder imputation); 83.7% (observed case, OC); ASAS40: 44.0% (non-responder imputation); 68.1% (OC); ASDAS inactive disease: 32.1% (last observation carried forward); 31.4% (OC)]. In the safety set (n = 315), there were 292.8 adverse events and 10.4 serious adverse events per 100 patient-years. No deaths were reported.

Conclusion: In the first study to evaluate the efficacy of an anti-TNF across both axSpA subpopulations, improvements in clinical and patient-reported outcomes at 24 and 96 weeks were sustained through 4 years of treatment, with no new safety signals.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01087762.

Keywords: ankylosing spondylitis; axial spondyloarthritis; certolizumab pegol; non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>ig</sc>. 1
Fig. 1
Patient disposition and retention to week 204 (A) Patient disposition to week 204 (percentages in brackets). aAll patients received allocated treatment. bOne patient did not enrol onto the dose-blind study period. (B) Patient retention to week 204 by subpopulations (CZP-randomized group, doses combined). CZP: certolizumab pegol.
F<sc>ig</sc>. 2
Fig. 2
ASAS and ASDAS responses to week 204 CZP-randomized group, doses combined. (A) ASAS responses to week 204 in axSpA population. (B) ASAS40 to week 204 by subpopulations. (C) ASDAS-ID and ASDAS-MD to week 204 by subpopulations. (D) ASDAS score to week 204 by subpopulations. ASDAS: AS DAS; ASDAS-ID: ASDAS inactive disease; ASDAS-MD: ASDAS moderate activity; CZP: certolizumab pegol.
F<sc>ig</sc>. 3
Fig. 3
Heat map of ASDAS disease activity to week 204 Patients with ASDAS-ID at week 24, sorted by baseline ASDAS. CZP-randomized group. ASDAS: AS DAS; ASDAS-ID: AS DAS inactive disease; CZP: certolizumab pegol; sustained remission: remission according to ASDAS inactive disease for a continuous period of 6 months at any time during the study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Linden SVD, Valkenburg HA, Cats A.. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:361–8. - PubMed
    1. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewe R. et al. The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:777–83. - PubMed
    1. Baraliakos X, Braun J.. Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: what are the similarities and differences? RMD Open 2015;1(Suppl 1):e000053. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stolwijk C, van Tubergen A, Castillo-Ortiz JD, Boonen A.. Prevalence of extra-articular manifestations in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:65–73. - PubMed
    1. Singh JA, Strand V.. Spondyloarthritis is associated with poor function and physical health-related quality of life. J Rheumatol 2009;36:1012–20. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data