Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 May 12;14(1):65.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0516-9.

ServAR: An augmented reality tool to guide the serving of food

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

ServAR: An augmented reality tool to guide the serving of food

Megan E Rollo et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: Accurate estimation of food portion size is a difficult task. Visual cues are important mediators of portion size and therefore technology-based aids may assist consumers when serving and estimating food portions. The current study evaluated the usability and impact on estimation error of standard food servings of a novel augmented reality food serving aid, ServAR.

Methods: Participants were randomised into one of three groups: 1) no information/aid (control); 2) verbal information on standard serving sizes; or 3) ServAR, an aid which overlayed virtual food servings over a plate using a tablet computer. Participants were asked to estimate the standard serving sizes of nine foods (broccoli, carrots, cauliflower, green beans, kidney beans, potato, pasta, rice, and sweetcorn) using validated food replicas. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared median served weights of each food to reference standard serving size weights. Percentage error was used to compare the estimation of serving size accuracy between the three groups. All participants also performed a usability test using the ServAR tool to guide the serving of one randomly selected food.

Results: Ninety adults (78.9% female; a mean (95%CI) age 25.8 (24.9-26.7) years; BMI 24.2 (23.2-25.2) kg/m2) completed the study. The median servings were significantly different to the reference portions for five foods in the ServAR group, compared to eight foods in the information only group and seven foods for the control group. The cumulative proportion of total estimations per group within ±10%, ±25% and ±50% of the reference portion was greater for those using ServAR (30.7, 65.2 and 90.7%; respectively), compared to the information only group (19.6, 47.4 and 77.4%) and control group (10.0, 33.7 and 68.9%). Participants generally found the ServAR tool easy to use and agreed that it showed potential to support optimal portion size selection. However, some refinements to the ServAR tool are required to improve the user experience.

Conclusions: Use of the augmented reality tool improved accuracy and consistency of estimating standard serve sizes compared to the information only and control conditions. ServAR demonstrates potential as a practical tool to guide the serving of food. Further evaluation across a broad range of foods, portion sizes and settings is warranted.

Keywords: Augmented reality; Estimation error; Nutrition; Portion control; mHealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Replica foods used in experiment. Clockwise from the top left: green beans, pasta (penne), broccoli, rice, potatoes, cauliflower, carrots, sweetcorn, and kidney (red) beans
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The ServAR tool. The tool comprised virtual objects consisting of the test food (e.g. green beans) in the reference portion size and an outline of the fiducial marker displayed on an iPad® Mini using the Zappar application. The iPad® Mini was fixed to a stand when used by the ServAR group during the main experimental study. Participants held the iPad® Mini during the usability activity in a manner similar to the demonstration in the figure
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percentage estimation error for each test food by experimental condition. The distribution of estimation error across conditions is displayed in the form of box-and-whisker plots for each food. The length of each box represents the interquartile range for the estimation error (the outer horizontal boarders represents the 25th and 75th percentiles), and the line drawn across the box represents the median error value. The crossbar of each whisker of the box represents the minimum and maximum error values. Outliers are indicated by open circles (○) and extreme values by stars (⋆). Horizontal lines are used to indicate levels of accuracy within 10% (formula image), ±25% (formula image), and ±50% (formula image)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Duffey KJ, Popkin BM. Energy density, portion size, and eating occasions: contributions to increased energy intake in the United States, 1977-2006. PLoS Med. 2011;8(6):e1001050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001050. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Piernas C, Popkin BM. Food portion patterns and trends among U.S. children and the relationship to total eating occasion size, 1977-2006. J Nutr. 2011;141(6):1159–1164. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.138727. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collins K, Watson JF, Collins CE. Food and beverage portion sizes in Australian children: a secondary analysis of 1995 and 2007 national data. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:517. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-517. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O'Brien SA, et al. Secular trends in reported portion size of food and beverages consumed by Irish adults. Br J Nutr. 2015;113(7):1148–1157. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515000276. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hollands GJ, et al. Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9:CD011045. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources