Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;34(9):568-572.
doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205980. Epub 2017 May 12.

Detection of pneumothoraces in patients with multiple blunt trauma: use and limitations of eFAST

Affiliations

Detection of pneumothoraces in patients with multiple blunt trauma: use and limitations of eFAST

Thomas C Sauter et al. Emerg Med J. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST) has been shown to have moderate sensitivity for detection of pneumothorax in trauma. Little is known about the location or size of missed pneumothoraces or clinical predictors of pneumothoraces in patients with false-negative eFAST.

Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study includes all patients with multiple blunt trauma diagnosed with pneumothorax who underwent both eFAST and CT performed in the ED of a level 1 trauma centre in Switzerland between 1 June 2012 and 30 September 2014. Sensitivity of eFAST for pneumothorax was determined using CT as the gold standard. Demographic and clinical characteristics of those who had a pneumothorax detected by eFAST and those who did not were compared using the Mann-Whitney U or Pearson's χ2 tests. Univariate binary logistic regression models were used to identify predictors for pneumothoraces in patients with negative eFAST examination.

Results: The study included 109 patients. Overall sensitivity for pneumothorax on eFAST was 0.59 and 0.81 for pneumothoraces requiring treatment. Compared with those detected by eFAST, missed pneumothoraces were less likely to be ventral (30 (47.6%) vs 4 (9.3%), p <0.001) and more likely to be apical and basal (7 (11.1%) vs 15 (34.9%), p=0.003; 11 (17.5%) vs 18 (41.9%), p=0.008, respectively). The missed pneumothoraces were smaller than the detected pneumothoraces (left side: 30.7±17.4 vs 12.1±13.9 mm; right side: 30.2±10.1 vs 6.9±10.2 mm, both p <0.001). No clinical variables were identified which predicted pneumothoraces in falsely negative eFAST. Among those pneumothoraces missed by eFAST, 30% required tube thoracostomy compared with 88.9% of those detected with eFAST.

Conclusion: In our study, pneumothoraces missed by eFAST were smaller and in atypical locations compared with those detected by eFAST and needed thoracic drainage less often.

Keywords: blunt trauma; eFAST; multiple trauma; pneumothorax; trauma room.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart. *More than one exclusion may apply to each excluded patient.

References

    1. Di Bartolomeo S, Sanson G, Nardi G, et al. . A population-based study on pneumothorax in severely traumatized patients. J Trauma 2001;51:677–82.10.1097/00005373-200110000-00009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW, Feliciano DV. The occult pneumothorax: what have we learned? Can J Surg 2009;52:E173–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW, Laupland KB, et al. . Factors related to the failure of radiographic recognition of occult posttraumatic pneumothoraces. Am J Surg 2005;189:541–6.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Misthos P, Kakaris S, Sepsas E, et al. . A prospective analysis of occult pneumothorax, delayed pneumothorax and delayed hemothorax after minor blunt thoracic trauma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:859–64.10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.01.044 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ball CG, Ranson K, Dente CJ, et al. . Clinical predictors of occult pneumothoraces in severely injured blunt polytrauma patients: a prospective observational study. Injury 2009;40:44–7.10.1016/j.injury.2008.07.015 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms