. 2017 May;63(5):e284-e290.

Computer use in primary care practices in Canada

Affiliations

¹ Research assistant at the Dalhousie Family Medicine Teaching Unit in Fredericton, NB.
² New Brunswick SPOR (Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Network) coordinator in Fredericton.
³ Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychology at University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh.
⁴ Professor and Director of Research at the Dalhousie Family Medicine Teaching Unit in Fredericton. baukjemiedema@gmail.com.
⁵ Scientist at the Élisabeth Bruyère Research Institute in Ottawa, Ont, and Professor and Senior Research Advisor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa and the C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre.
⁶ Director of the Centre for Health Services and Policy Research at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver.
⁷ Professor in the Department of Family Medicine and the Department of Community Health Sciences and Director of Research at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, and Director of the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy.
⁸ Professor and Research Director of the Primary Care Research Unit in the Department of Family Medicine at Dalhousie University in Halifax, NS, and the science lead for Building Research for Integrated Primary Healthcare.
⁹ Director of the Centre for Rural Health Studies at Memorial University of Newfoundland in St John's.
¹⁰ Program evaluation consultant for the Quality Health Council of Alberta in Edmonton.
¹¹ Associate Professor in the Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation at the University of Toronto in Ontario.

PMID: 28500211
PMCID: PMC5429070

Computer use in primary care practices in Canada

Yvonne Anisimowicz et al. Can Fam Physician. 2017 May.

. 2017 May;63(5):e284-e290.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Research assistant at the Dalhousie Family Medicine Teaching Unit in Fredericton, NB.
² New Brunswick SPOR (Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Network) coordinator in Fredericton.
³ Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychology at University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh.
⁴ Professor and Director of Research at the Dalhousie Family Medicine Teaching Unit in Fredericton. baukjemiedema@gmail.com.
⁵ Scientist at the Élisabeth Bruyère Research Institute in Ottawa, Ont, and Professor and Senior Research Advisor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa and the C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre.
⁶ Director of the Centre for Health Services and Policy Research at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver.
⁷ Professor in the Department of Family Medicine and the Department of Community Health Sciences and Director of Research at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, and Director of the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy.
⁸ Professor and Research Director of the Primary Care Research Unit in the Department of Family Medicine at Dalhousie University in Halifax, NS, and the science lead for Building Research for Integrated Primary Healthcare.
⁹ Director of the Centre for Rural Health Studies at Memorial University of Newfoundland in St John's.
¹⁰ Program evaluation consultant for the Quality Health Council of Alberta in Edmonton.
¹¹ Associate Professor in the Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation at the University of Toronto in Ontario.

PMID: 28500211
PMCID: PMC5429070

Abstract
in English, French

Objective: To examine the use of computers in primary care practices.

Design: The international Quality and Cost of Primary Care study was conducted in Canada in 2013 and 2014 using a descriptive cross-sectional survey method to collect data from practices across Canada. Participating practices filled out several surveys, one of them being the Family Physician Survey, from which this study collected its data.

Setting: All 10 Canadian provinces.

Participants: A total of 788 family physicians.

Main outcome measures: A computer use scale measured the extent to which family physicians integrated computers into their practices, with higher scores indicating a greater integration of computer use in practice. Analyses included t tests and ² tests comparing new and traditional models of primary care on measures of computer use and electronic health record (EHR) use, as well as descriptive statistics.

Results: Nearly all (97.5%) physicians reported using a computer in their practices, with moderately high computer use scale scores (mean [SD] score of 5.97 [2.96] out of 9), and many (65.7%) reported using EHRs. Physicians with practices operating under new models of primary care reported incorporating computers into their practices to a greater extent (mean [SD] score of 6.55 [2.64]) than physicians operating under traditional models did (mean [SD] score of 5.33 [3.15]; t_726.60 = 5.84; P < .001; Cohen d = 0.42, 95% CI 0.808 to 1.627) and were more likely to report using EHRs (73.8% vs 56.7%; [Formula: see text]; P < .001; odds ratio = 2.15). Overall, there was a statistically significant variability in computer use across provinces.

Conclusion: Most family physicians in Canada have incorporated computers into their practices for administrative and scholarly activities; however, EHRs have not been adopted consistently across the country. Physicians with practices operating under the new, more collaborative models of primary care use computers more comprehensively and are more likely to use EHRs than those in practices operating under traditional models of primary care.

Objectif: Vérifier l’utilisation qu’on fait de l’ordinateur dans les cliniques de soins primaires.

Type d’étude: L’étude Quality and Costs of Primary Care a été effectuée en 2013 et 2014 à l’aide d’enquêtes descriptives transversales dans le but de recueillir des données sur la pratique médicale au Canada. Les cliniques participantes ont répondu à plusieurs de ces enquêtes, notamment au Sondage national des médecins; ce sont les données de cette étude que nous avons utilisées.

Contexte: Les 10 provinces du Canada.

Participants: Un total de 788 médecins de famille.

Principaux paramètres à l’étude: On a utilisé une échelle d’utilisation de l’ordinateur pour déterminer à quel point les médecins de famille utilisaient l’ordinateur dans leur pratique, les scores élevés indiquant une meilleure intégration de cet outil dans leur pratique. Les analyses incluaient des tests de t et de formula image ² pour savoir si l’utilisation de modèles nouveaux ou traditionnels pour les soins primaires avaient une influence sur l’adoption du dossier électronique de santé (DES); des statistiques descriptives ont aussi été utilisées.

Résultats: Presque tous les médecins (97,5 %) ont déclaré se servir de l’ordinateur dans leur pratique, avec des scores modérément élevés (score moyen [DS] de 5,97 [2,96] sur 9) tandis que plusieurs (65,7 %) mentionnaient l’utiliser pour le DES. D’après leurs déclarations, les médecins exerçant dans des cliniques utilisant les nouveaux modèles de soins primaires étaient de plus grands utilisateurs de l’ordinateur que ceux qui travaillaient selon le modèle traditionnel (score moyen [DS] de 6,55 [2,64] contre 5,33 [3,15]; t_726,60 = 5.,84; P < ,001; d de Cohen = 0,42, IC à 95 % 0,808 à 1,627); ils étaient aussi plus susceptibles de dire qu’ils utilisaient le DES (73,8 % contre 56,7 %; $χ_{1}^{2} = 25, 43$ ; P < ,001; rapport de cotes = 2,15). On notait aussi que l’utilisation de l’ordinateur varie de façon significative entre les provinces.

Conclusion: Au Canada, la plupart des médecins de famille ont intégré l’ordinateur à leur pratique pour des activités d’ordre administratif ou pour de la formation; toutefois, cet outil n’a pas été adopté de manière égale partout dans le pays. Les médecins qui exercent selon de nouveaux modèles de soins primaires, davantage axés sur la collaboration, utilisent l’ordinateur de façon plus globale et sont plus susceptibles d’utiliser les DES que ceux qui fonctionnent selon des modèles traditionnels de soins primaires.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Does not compute.
Pimlott N. Pimlott N. Can Fam Physician. 2017 May;63(5):342. Can Fam Physician. 2017. PMID: 28500184 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Cited by

Déploiement à grande échelle des dossiers médicaux électroniques chez les médecins de famille canadiens: Points de vue d’un formateur clinique.
Viner G, Monkman H, Kushniruk A, Archibald D. Viner G, et al. Can Fam Physician. 2020 Nov;66(11):e276-e278. Can Fam Physician. 2020. PMID: 33208437 Free PMC article. French. No abstract available.
Extending large-scale electronic health records to Canadian family physicians: Perspectives from a clinical trainer.
Viner G, Monkman H, Kushniruk A, Archibald D. Viner G, et al. Can Fam Physician. 2020 Nov;66(11):799-801. Can Fam Physician. 2020. PMID: 33208418 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Does not compute.
Pimlott N. Pimlott N. Can Fam Physician. 2017 May;63(5):342. Can Fam Physician. 2017. PMID: 28500184 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Promoting cross-jurisdictional primary health care research: developing a set of common indicators across 12 community-based primary health care teams in Canada.
Wong ST, Langton JM, Katz A, Fortin M, Godwin M, Green M, Grunfeld E, Hassani K, Kendall C, Liddy C, Ploeg J, Wodchis WP, Haggerty JL. Wong ST, et al. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 Jan;20:e7. doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000518. Epub 2018 Nov 6. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019. PMID: 30396376 Free PMC article.
Digital maturity and its determinants in General Practice: A cross-sectional study in 20 countries.
Teixeira F, Li E, Laranjo L, Collins C, Irving G, Fernandez MJ, Car J, Ungan M, Petek D, Hoffman R, Majeed A, Nessler K, Lingner H, Jimenez G, Darzi A, Jácome C, Neves AL. Teixeira F, et al. Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;10:962924. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.962924. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36711349 Free PMC article.

References

1. Sobral D, Rosenbaum M, Figueiredo-Braga M. Computer use in primary care and patient-physician communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(12):1568–76. - PubMed
1. Garets D, Davis M. Electronic medical records vs. electronic health records: yes, there is a difference. Chicago, IL: HIMSS Analytics, LLC; 2006.
1. Bodenheimer T. Coordinating care—a perilous journey through the health care system. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(10):1064–71. - PubMed
1. Dahrouge S, Hogg WE, Russell G, Tuna M, Geneau R, Muldoon LK, et al. Impact of remuneration and organizational factors on completing preventive manoeuvres in primary care practices. CMAJ. 2012;184(2):E135–43. - PMC - PubMed
1. Garets D, Davis M. EMRs and EHRs. Concepts as different as apples and oranges at least deserve separate names. Healthc Inform. 2005;22(10):53–4. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Computer use in primary care practices in Canada

Affiliations

Computer use in primary care practices in Canada

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract
in English, French

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Abstract in English, French

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Abstract
in English, French