Role of Non-Statins, LDL-C Thresholds, and Special Population Considerations: A Look at the Updated 2016 ACC Consensus Committee Recommendations
- PMID: 28500517
- DOI: 10.1007/s11883-017-0666-x
Role of Non-Statins, LDL-C Thresholds, and Special Population Considerations: A Look at the Updated 2016 ACC Consensus Committee Recommendations
Abstract
Purpose of review: The 2013 ACC/AHA Cholesterol guidelines was a major paradigm shift in the management and treatment of dyslipidemia. The new guidelines outlined "statin benefit groups," highlighted weighing the benefit versus risks of statin therapy ("net benefit"), and discussed the importance of shared decision making between patients and providers in primary prevention. While there was widespread agreement on the main groups benefiting from statin therapy, there was significant controversy regarding LDL-C goals and thresholds, the role of non-statin therapy, and the use of statins in specific populations. The goal of this review is to understand the rationale for the updated 2016 ACC Expert Consensus on Non-Statins and to contrast it with the 2015 NLA Recommendations on the Management of Dyslipidemia.
Recent findings: The findings of the ACC Expert Consensus Panel were largely influenced by the results of several new clinical trials using non-statin therapy in combination with moderate to high intensity statin therapy. The IMPROVE-IT trial demonstrated that ezetimibe on top of statin therapy lowered ASCVD risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes whose LDL was driven below the previous LDL-C target of <70 mg/dL. In addition, preliminary data assessing the safety of evolocumab and alirocumab on top of statin therapy suggested possible large reductions in ASCVD risk in post hoc analysis. Both the 2016 ACC Consensus Recommendations and the 2015 NLA Recommendations emphasize the importance of maximally tolerated statin therapy, the use of adjunctive non-statin LDL lowering therapy, and the use of LDL-C goals and thresholds to guide intensification of LDL lowering therapy. Although there are some important differences between the ACC Consensus and NLA recommendations in terms of treatment of special populations (i.e., CHF) and on the use of non-HDL-C goals and thresholds, both guidelines support a role for ezetimibe, bile acid sequestrants, and PCSK-9 inhibitors in patients on maximum tolerated statin therapy. The recent positive results of the FOURIER trial gives additional support to the non-statin recommendations of both the ACC and NLA.
Keywords: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD); Clinical practice guidelines; Dyslipidemia; Ezetimibe; LDL-C targets; Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C); PCSK9 inhibitors; Statins.
Similar articles
-
2017 Focused Update of the 2016 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Role of Non-Statin Therapies for LDL-Cholesterol Lowering in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 3;70(14):1785-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.745. Epub 2017 Sep 5. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28886926
-
What's next for dyslipidemia management? The 2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines, the NLA recommendations, and beyond.J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016 May-Jun;56(3):284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2015.12.017. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016. PMID: 27156942 Review.
-
A Clinical Guide to Combination Lipid-Lowering Therapy.Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018 Mar 7;20(4):19. doi: 10.1007/s11883-018-0721-2. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018. PMID: 29516190 Review.
-
Simulation of Lipid-Lowering Therapy Intensification in a Population With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Sep 1;2(9):959-966. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2289. JAMA Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28768335 Free PMC article.
-
How effective are the ESC/EAS and 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines in treating dyslipidemia? Lessons from a lipid clinic.Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Feb;31(2):221-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.982751. Epub 2014 Nov 24. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015. PMID: 25418708
Cited by
-
Usefulness of alirocumab and evolocumab for the treatment of patients with diabetic dyslipidemia.Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2018 Apr 11;31(2):180-184. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2018.1441255. eCollection 2018 Apr. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2018. PMID: 29706812 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dynamic trends of ischemic heart disease mortality attributable to high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a joinpoint analysis and age-period-cohort analysis with predictions.Lipids Health Dis. 2024 Sep 11;23(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12944-024-02274-y. Lipids Health Dis. 2024. PMID: 39261844 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Lipid-Lowering Therapy on Mortality According to the Baseline Non-HDL Cholesterol Level: A Meta-Analysis.High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2019 Aug;26(4):263-272. doi: 10.1007/s40292-019-00330-8. Epub 2019 Jul 16. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2019. PMID: 31313082
-
Pragmatic Analysis of Dyslipidemia Involvement in Coronary Artery Disease: A Narrative Review.Curr Cardiol Rev. 2020;16(1):36-47. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666190522100041. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2020. PMID: 31113345 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-Term All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in Asymptomatic Patients With CAC ≥1,000: Results From the CAC Consortium.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jan;13(1 Pt 1):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Mar 15. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020. PMID: 31005541 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous