Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;18(5):555-566.
doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0790-4.

Natural Peer Leaders as Substance Use Prevention Agents: the Teens' Life Choice Project

Megan M Golonka  1 , Kristen F Peairs  2 , Patrick S Malone  2 , Christina L Grimes  2 , Philip R Costanzo  2
Affiliations

Natural Peer Leaders as Substance Use Prevention Agents: the Teens' Life Choice Project

Megan M Golonka et al. Prev Sci. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

In adolescent social groups, natural peer leaders have been found to engage in more frequent experimentation with substance use and to possess disproportionate power to affect the behavior and social choices of their associated peer followers. In the current exploratory study, we used sociometrics and social cognitive mapping to identify natural leaders of cliques in a seventh grade population and invited the leaders to develop anti-drug presentations for an audience of younger peers. The program employed social-psychological approaches directed at having leaders proceed from extrinsic inducements to intrinsic identification with their persuasive products in the context of the group intervention process. The goals of the intervention were to induce substance resistant self-persuasion in the leaders and to produce a spread of this resistance effect to their peer followers. To test the intervention, we compared the substance use behaviors of the selected leaders and their peers to a control cohort. The study found preliminary support that the intervention produced changes in the substance use behavior among the leaders who participated in the intervention, but did not detect a spread to non-leader peers in the short term. This descriptive study speaks to the plausibility of employing self-persuasion paradigms to bring about change in high-risk behaviors among highly central adolescents. In addition, it highlights the viability of applying social psychological principles to prevention work and calls for more research in this area.

Keywords: Intervention; Leaders; Social networks; Substance use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow chart for the Teens’ Life Choices Project
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alexander C, Piazza M, Mekos D, Valente T. Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2001;29:22–30. - PubMed
    1. Allen JP, Porter MR, McFarland FC, Marsh P, McElhaney KB. The two faces of adolescents’ success with peers: Adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. Child Development. 2005;76:747–760. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arkin RM, Roemhild H, Johnson C, Luepker R, Murray D. The Minnesota smoking prevention program: A seventh-grade health curriculum supplement. Journal of School Health. 1981;51:611–616. - PubMed
    1. Aronson E. Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In: Abelson R, McGuire W, Newcomb T, Rosenberg M, Tannenbaum P, editors. Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Source Book. Chicago: Rand McNally; 1968.
    1. Botvin GJ. Preventing drug abuse in schools: Social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-level etiologic factors. Addictive Behaviors. 2000;25:887–897. - PubMed

Publication types