Limited Evidence Suggests There Is No Difference Between the Clinical Longevity of direct vs Indirect Composite Resins in Class I and II Cavities
- PMID: 28501055
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.03.012
Limited Evidence Suggests There Is No Difference Between the Clinical Longevity of direct vs Indirect Composite Resins in Class I and II Cavities
Abstract
Article title and bibliographic information: Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Da Veiga AMA, Cunha AC, Ferreria DMTP, Fidalgo TK, Chianca TK, Reis KR, Maia LC. J Dent 2016;54:1-12.
Source of funding: Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. This study was conducted as part of the master degree for one of the authors under supervision by another author.
Type of study/design: Systematic review with meta-analysis.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment on
-
Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Dent. 2016 Nov;54:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 11. J Dent. 2016. PMID: 27523636
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials