Protocol for the development of a Core Outcome Set (COS) for hemorrhoidal disease: an international Delphi study
- PMID: 28501943
- PMCID: PMC5486628
- DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2833-5
Protocol for the development of a Core Outcome Set (COS) for hemorrhoidal disease: an international Delphi study
Abstract
Purpose: Over the last decade, many studies were performed regarding treatment options for hemorrhoidal disease. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) should have well-defined primary and secondary outcomes. However, the reported outcome measures are numerous and diverse. The heterogeneity of outcome definition in clinical trials limits transparency and paves the way for bias. The development of a core outcome set (COS) helps minimizing this problem. A COS is an agreed minimum set of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials of a specific disease. The aim of this project is to generate a COS regarding the outcome of treatment after hemorrhoidal disease.
Methods: A Delphi study will be performed by an international steering group healthcare professionals and patients with the intention to create a standard outcome set for future clinical trials for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. First, a literature review will be conducted to establish which outcomes are used in clinical trials for hemorrhoidal disease. Secondly, both healthcare professionals and patients will participate in several consecutive rounds of online questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting to refine the content of the COS.
Discussion: Development of a COS for hemorrhoidal disease defines a minimum outcome-reporting standard and will improve the quality of research in the future.
Keywords: Anal; Core outcome set; Delphi; Endpoints; Hemorrhoids; Protocol.
Conflict of interest statement
The ethical committee of Maastricht University Medical Centre confirmed that the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does not apply to the abovementioned study and that an official approval of this study by the committee is not required (METC 16-4-078).
References
-
- Brown S, Tiernan J, Biggs K, Hind D, Shephard N, Bradburn M, et al. The HubBLe trial: haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for symptomatic second- and third-degree haemorrhoids: a multicentre randomised controlled trial and health-economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(88):1–150. doi: 10.3310/hta20880. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gaj F, Biviano I, Sportelli G, Candeloro L. Rubber band ligation in treatment of hemorrhoids: our experience. Clin Ter. 2015;166(4):162–167. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
