Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Apr 28:7:153.
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00153. eCollection 2017.

Positive Effect of Probiotics on Constipation in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Six Randomized Controlled Trials

Ruixue Huang  1 , Jianan Hu  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Positive Effect of Probiotics on Constipation in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Six Randomized Controlled Trials

Ruixue Huang et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. .

Abstract

Context: Constipation in children is a prevalent, burdensome, and psychologically important pediatric issue, the treatment of which remains a global challenge. The use of probiotics has been reported for management of the gastrointestinal microbiota. Objective: This study reviewed the existing literatures of 6 Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) to ascertain some baseline understanding and available information for the effects of probiotics on stool frequency and consistency in children with constipation. Data Sources: PubMed, Springer, Elsevier Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid (Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO), Orbis, and Web of Science from the earliest record in each database to 15 September, 2016. Study selection: Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials that compared the effect of probiotics interventions to any control intervention on stool frequency and consistency. Data Extraction: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases. The meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.3 software using a randomized model. Results: Six studies were identified. The use of probiotics significantly increased the stool frequency [mean difference (MD), 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14-1.31; P = 0.02]. Subgroup assessment showed a significantly increased stool frequency in Asian patients (MD, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.33-2.02; P = 0.006), but no significant difference in stool consistency (MD, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.21-0.06; P = 0.27). Limitations: Only six RCTs met the criteria and were included. Each RCT in this study was performed in a different country, and some of the included studies had a small sample size, which might have influenced the reliability and validity of the conclusions. Conclusion: The present study shows that probiotics increase stool frequency and have beneficial effects in Asian children. However, caution is needed when interpreting these outcomes because of the existence of heterogeneity. Evidence from larger samples and more adequately powered RCTs with results obtained by standardized measurements are necessary to determine which species and dosage of probiotics and what length of treatment are most efficacious for constipation in children.

Keywords: children; constipation; meta-analysis; probiotics; randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of studies included in meta-analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Bar chart comparing percentage risk of bias for each included RCT. The risk of bias was quite low. (B) Risk of bias for each included RCT, representing low risk of bias (+), high risk of bias (−), and unclear risk of bias (?).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plots of RCTs in patients with constipation comparing probiotics with placebo or other intervention. Random-effects models were used to analyze the MD and 95% CI. (A) Overall outcomes of the six studies. (B) Subgroup analysis by age. (C) Subgroup analysis by geographical area.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of outcome of meta-analysis of RCTs regarding stool consistency in children with constipation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Funnel plot of publication bias analysis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ait-Belgnaoui A., Han W., Lamine F., Eutamene H., Fioramonti J., Bueno L., et al. . (2006). Lactobacillus farciminis treatment suppresses stress induced visceral hypersensitivity: a possible action through interaction with epithelial cell cytoskeleton contraction. Gut 55, 1090–1094. 10.1136/gut.2005.084194 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Applegate J. A., Fischer Walker C. L., Ambikapathi R., Black R. E. (2013). Systematic review of probiotics for the treatment of community-acquired acute diarrhea in children. BMC Public Health 13(Suppl. 3):S16. 10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S16 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banaszkiewicz A., Szajewska H. (2005). Ineffectiveness of Lactobacillus GG as an adjunct to lactulose for the treatment of constipation in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. J. Pediatr. 146, 364–369. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.10.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bekkali N. L., Bongers M. E., Van den Berg M. M., Liem O., Benninga M. A. (2007). The role of a probiotics mixture in the treatment of childhood constipation: a pilot study. Nutr. J. 6:17. 10.1186/1475-2891-6-17 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benninga M. A., Candy D. C., Taminiau J. A. (2005). New treatment options in childhood constipation? J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 41(Suppl. 1), S56–S57. 10.1097/01.scs.0000180307.02052.56 - DOI - PubMed