Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 1;13(3):612-616.
doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.64044. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

Peritoneal lavage examination as a prognostic tool in cases of gastric cancer

Affiliations

Peritoneal lavage examination as a prognostic tool in cases of gastric cancer

David Hoskovec et al. Arch Med Sci. .

Abstract

Introduction: Peritoneal tumor seeding is a common form of recurrence after gastric cancer surgery. The finding of free tumor cells and/or elevation of tumor markers in the peritoneal fluid could predict intraperitoneal tumor recurrence. The results of these examination can be used for indication of aggressive treatment modalities such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Material and methods: We have operated on 105 patients suffering from gastric cancer. The control group consisted of 12 patients without malignant disease. Peritoneal lavage fluid or ascites was collected immediately after laparotomy and examined by cytology and biochemistry (levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and Ca 19-9). Sensitivity, specificity, stage correlation and overall survival were observed.

Results: Elevation of tumor markers or the finding of free intraperitoneal tumor cells predicts recurrence. The prognosis of these patients is same as in stage IV TNM classification with median survival time less than 1 year (p = 0.713). Patients with negative cytology have median survival time 5 years contrary to them with positive cytology (p < 0.001). Sensitivity of the cytology was 34% and specificity was 85%. Sensitivity of biochemistry was 53% (combination of both markers) and specificity was 100%.

Conclusions: This study confirms the importance of peritoneal fluid examination for the prognosis. We cannot recommend routine use as an indicator for HIPEC due to low sensitivity, but the result of cytological examination is an independent factor for patient survival.

Keywords: gastric cancer; peritoneal biochemistry; peritoneal cytology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall survival

References

    1. Aiko T, Sasako M. The new Japanese clasification of gastric carcinoma: points to be revised. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:25–30. - PubMed
    1. Washington K. 7thEdition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3077–9. - PubMed
    1. Makary MA, Warshaw AL, Centeno BA, Willett CG, Rattner DW, del Castillo CF. Implications of peritoneal cytology for pancreatic cancer management. Arch Surg. 1998;133:361–5. - PubMed
    1. Marutsuka T, Shimda S, Shiomori K, Ogawa M. Peritoneal metastasis after operation for non-serosa-invasive gastric carcinoma and prophylatic strategy for peritoneal dissemination. International Congress Series. 2003;1255:103–7. - PubMed
    1. Swan R, Miner TJ. Current role of surgical theray in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:372–9. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources