Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;60(3):367-382.
doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0879-3. Epub 2017 May 16.

Deforestation and Carbon Loss in Southwest Amazonia: Impact of Brazil's Revised Forest Code

Pedro Augusto Costa Roriz  1 , Aurora Miho Yanai  1 , Philip Martin Fearnside  2   3
Affiliations

Deforestation and Carbon Loss in Southwest Amazonia: Impact of Brazil's Revised Forest Code

Pedro Augusto Costa Roriz et al. Environ Manage. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

In 2012 Brazil's National Congress altered the country's Forest Code, decreasing various environmental protections in the set of regulations governing forests. This suggests consequences in increased deforestation and emissions of greenhouse gases and in decreased protection of fragile ecosystems. To ascertain the effects, a simulation was run to the year 2025 for the municipality (county) of Boca do Acre, Amazonas state, Brazil. A baseline scenario considered historical behavior (which did not respect the Forest Code), while two scenarios considered full compliance with the old Forest Code (Law 4771/1965) and the current Code (Law 12,651/2012) regarding the protection of "areas of permanent preservation" (APPs) along the edges of watercourses. The models were parameterized from satellite imagery and simulated using Dinamica-EGO software. Deforestation actors and processes in the municipality were observed in loco in 2012. Carbon emissions and loss of forest by 2025 were computed in the three simulation scenarios. There was a 10% difference in the loss of carbon stock and of forest between the scenarios with the two versions of the Forest Code. The baseline scenario showed the highest loss of carbon stocks and the highest increase in annual emissions. The greatest damage was caused by not protecting wetlands and riparian zones.

Keywords: Climate change; Forest policy; Global warming; Land-use change; Landscape dynamics; Tropical forest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study area
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Land-cover map for 2012
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Map of regions for the scenarios with details for the regions for APP and areas of permanent protection cleared by 2008 (APP2008). a 2012 Forest Code (Law 12.651/2012), b 1965 Forest Code (Law 4.771/1965)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Percentage of similarity between the simulated and the real map for 2012
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Temporal distribution (2012 to 2025) of land-cover classes based on simulated scenarios. a Deforestation, b Secondary vegetation, c Forest
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Distribution of land-use classes by region in 2012 and for each scenario in 2025. a Secondary vegetation, b Deforestation, c Forest. R1-CU Region 1 Conservation units, R2-IL Region 2 Indigenous lands, R3-RB Region 3 River buffer, R4-IR Region 4 Influence of roads, R5-IA Region 5 Isolated areas, R6-APP Region 6 Areas of permanent protection
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Losses of carbon stocks in 2025 for the study area a whole and by region. R1-CU Region 1 Conservation units, R2-IL Region 2 Indigenous lands, R3-RB Region 3 River buffer, R4-IR Region 4 Influence of roads, R5-IA Region 5 Isolated areas, R6-APP Region 6 Areas of permanent protection
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Comparison of annual emissions of carbon in each simulated scenario
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Initial map (2012) and modeled scenarios (2025). a Observed land use (2012), b Baseline scenario (2025), c 1965 Forest Code scenario (2025), d 2012 Forest Code scenario (2025)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Almeida CA (2009) Estimativa da área e do tempo de permanência da vegetação secundária na Amazônia Legal por meio de imagens Landsat/TM. pp. 129 (INPE-15651-TDI/1429). Master’s dissertation in remote sensing. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, http://urlib.net/sid.inpe.br/mtc-m18@80/2008/11.04.18.45.
    1. Alves Sobrinho T, Oliveira PTS, Rodrigues DBB, Ayres FM. Delimitação automática de bacias hidrográficas utilizando dados SRTM. Engenharia Agrícola. 2010;30(1):46–57. doi: 10.1590/S0100-69162010000100005. - DOI
    1. Barni PE, Fearnside PM, Graça PMLA. Simulating deforestation and carbon loss in Amazonia: impacts in Brazil’s Roraima state from reconstructing Highway BR-319 (Manaus-Porto Velho) Environ Manage. 2015;55(2):259–278. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0408-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brazil (2012) Lei n° 12.651, de 25 de maio de 2012. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12651.htm
    1. Brazil (2015) Intended Nationally Determined Contribution towards Achieving the Objective of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. pp. 10 http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Brazil/1/B...

LinkOut - more resources