Tramadol with or without paracetamol (acetaminophen) for cancer pain
- PMID: 28510996
- PMCID: PMC6481722
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012508.pub2
Tramadol with or without paracetamol (acetaminophen) for cancer pain
Abstract
Background: Tramadol is an opioid analgesic licensed for use in moderate to severe pain. It is considered as a low risk for abuse, so control regulations are not as stringent as for 'strong' opioids such as morphine. It has a potential role as a step 2 option of the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder.
Objectives: To assess the benefits and adverse effects of tramadol with or without paracetamol (acetaminophen) for cancer-related pain.
Search methods: We searched the following databases using a wide range of search terms: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS. We also searched three clinical trials registry databases. The date of the last search was 2 November 2016.
Selection criteria: We selected studies that were randomised, with placebo or active controls, or both, and included a minimum of 10 participants per treatment arm. We were interested particularly in blinded studies, but also included open studies.We excluded non-randomised studies, studies of experimental pain, case reports, and clinical observations.
Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently extracted data using a standard form and checked for agreement before entry into Review Manager 5. We included information about the number of participants treated and demographic details, type of cancer, drug and dosing regimen, study design (placebo or active control) and methods, study duration and follow-up, analgesic outcome measures and results, withdrawals, and adverse events. We collated multiple reports of the same study, so that each study, rather than each report, was the unit of interest in the review. We assessed the evidence using GRADE and created a 'Summary of findings' table.The main outcomes of interest for benefit were pain reduction of 30% or greater and 50% or greater from baseline, participants with pain no worse than mild, and participants feeling much improved or very much improved.
Main results: We included 10 studies (12 reports) with 958 adult participants. All the studies enrolled participants with chronic malignant tumour-related pain who were experiencing pain intensities described as moderate to severe, with most experiencing at least 4/10 with current treatment. The mean ages were 59 to 70 years, with participants aged between 24 and 87 years. Study length ranged from one day to six months. Five studies used a cross-over design. Tramadol doses ranged from 50 mg as single dose to 600 mg per day; doses of 300 mg per day to 400 mg per day were most common.Nine studies were at high risk of bias for one to four criteria (only one high risk of bias for size). We judged all the results to be very low quality evidence because of widespread lack of blinding of outcome assessment, inadequately described sequence generation, allocation concealment, and small numbers of participants and events. Important outcomes were poorly reported. There were eight different active comparators and one comparison with placebo. There was little information available for any comparison and no firm conclusions could be drawn for any outcome.Single comparisons of oral tramadol with codeine plus paracetamol, of dihydrocodeine, and of rectal versus oral tramadol provided no data for key outcomes. One study used tramadol combined with paracetamol; four participants received this intervention. One study compared tramadol with flupirtine - a drug that is no longer available. One study compared tramadol with placebo and a combination of cobrotoxin, tramadol, and ibuprofen, but the dosing schedule poorly explained.Two studies (191 participants) compared tramadol with buprenorphine. One study (131 participants) reported a similar proportion of no or mild pain at 14 days.Three studies (300 participants) compared tramadol with morphine. Only one study, combining tramadol, tramadol plus paracetamol, and paracetamol plus codeine as a single weak-opioid group reported results. Weak opioid produced reduction in pain of at least 30% from baseline in 55/117 (47%) participants, compared with 91/110 (82%) participants with morphine. Weak opioid produced reduction in pain of at least 50% in 49/117 (42%) participants, compared with 83/110 (75%) participants with morphine.There was no useful information for any other outcome of benefit or harm.
Authors' conclusions: There is limited, very low quality, evidence from randomised controlled trials that tramadol produced pain relief in some adults with pain due to cancer and no evidence at all for children. There is very low quality evidence that it is not as effective as morphine. This review does not provide a reliable indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is very high. The place of tramadol in managing cancer pain and its role as step 2 of the WHO analgesic ladder is unclear.
Conflict of interest statement
PW: none known.
SD: none known.
RAM has received grant support from Grünenthal relating to individual patient level analyses of trial data regarding tapentadol in osteoarthritis and back pain (2015). He has received honoraria for attending boards with Menarini concerning methods of analgesic trial design (2014), with Novartis (2014) about the design of network meta‐analyses, and RB on understanding pharmacokinetics of drug uptake (2015). He has received honoraria from Omega Pharma (2016) and Futura Pharma (2016) for providing advice on trial and data analysis methods.
This review was identified in a 2019 audit as not meeting the current definition of the Cochrane Commercial Sponsorship policy. At the time of its publication it was compliant with the interpretation of the existing policy. As with all reviews, new and updated, at update this review will be revised according to 2020 policy update.
Figures
Update of
References
References to studies included in this review
Bandieri 2016 {published data only}
Bono 1997 {published data only}
-
- Bono AV, Cuffari S. Effectiveness and tolerance of tramadol in cancer pain. A comparative study with respect to buprenorphine [Efficacite et tolerance du tramadol dans les douleurs neoplasiques. Etude comparative par rapport a la buprenorphine]. Drugs 1997;53 (Suppl 2):40‐9. [PUBMED: 9190324] - PubMed
Brema 1996 {published data only}
-
- Brema F, Pastorino G, Martini MC, Gottlieb A, Luzzani M, Libretti A, et al. Oral tramadol and buprenorphine in tumour pain. An Italian multicentre trial. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Research 1996;16(4‐5):109‐16. [PUBMED: 9172009] - PubMed
Leppert 2001 {published data only}
-
- Leppert W. Analgesic efficacy and side effects of oral tramadol and morphine administered orally in the treatment of pain. Nowotwory 2001;51:257‐66.
Leppert 2010 {published data only}
Luben 1994 {published data only}
-
- Luben V, Muller H, Lobisch M, Worz R. Treatment of tumor pain with flupirtine. Results of a double‐blind study versus tramadol. Fortschritte der Medizin 1994;112(19):282‐6. [PUBMED: 7927099] - PubMed
Mercadante 2005 {published data only}
-
- Mercadante S, Arcuri E, Fusco F, Tirelli W, Villari P, Bussolino C, et al. Randomized double‐blind, double‐dummy crossover clinical trial of oral tramadol versus rectal tramadol administration in opioid‐naive cancer patients with pain. Supportive Care in Cancer 2005;13(9):702‐7. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-004-0760-9] - DOI - PubMed
Rodriguez 2007 {published data only}
-
- Rodriguez RF, Castillo JM, Castillo MP, Montoya O, Daza P, Rodriguez MF, et al. Hydrocodone/acetaminophen and tramadol chlorhydrate combination tablets for the management of chronic cancer pain: a double‐blind comparative trial. [Erratum appears in Clinical Journal of Pain 2008;24(7):649]. Clinical Journal of Pain 2008;24(1):1‐4. [DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318156ca4d] - DOI - PubMed
Wilder‐Smith 1994 {published data only}
-
- Wilder‐Smith CH, Schimke J, Osterwalder B, Senn HJ. Oral tramadol, a mu‐opioid agonist and monoamine reuptake‐blocker, and morphine for strong cancer‐related pain. Annals of Oncology 1994;5(2):141‐6. [PUBMED: 8186157] - PubMed
Xu 2006 {published data only}
-
- Xu JM, Song ST, Feng FY, Huang FL, Yang Y, Xie GR, et al. Cobrotoxin‐containing analgesic compound to treat chronic moderate to severe cancer pain: results from a randomized, double‐blind, cross‐over study and from an open‐label study. Oncology Reports 2006;16(5):1077‐84. [DOI: 10.3892/or.16.5.1077] - DOI - PubMed
References to studies excluded from this review
Arbaiza 2007 {published data only}
Marinangeli 2007 {published data only}
Tassinari 2011 {published data only}
Yavuz 2004 {published data only}
-
- Yavuz L, Eroglu F, Ozsoy M. The efficacy of intravenous versus epidural tramadol with patient‐controlled analgesia (PCA) in gynecologic cancer pain. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology 2004;25(2):215‐8. [PUBMED: 15032285] - PubMed
Additional references
AlBalawi 2013
Bao 2016
Beakley 2015
-
- Beakley BD, Kaye AM, Kaye AD. Tramadol, pharmacology, side effects, and serotonin syndrome: a review. Pain Physician 2015;18(4):395‐400. [PUBMED: 26218943] - PubMed
Bozkurt 2005
Breivik 2009
Cancer Research UK 2016
-
- Cancer Research UK. Cancer statistics for the UK. www.cancerresearchuk.org/health‐professional/cancer‐statistics (accessed 21 November 2016).
Cepeda 2006
Dechartres 2013
Dechartres 2014
Deng 2012
Dreidi 2016
Dworkin 2008
Edwards 2002
EMA 2013
-
- European Medicines Agency. Flupirtine‐containing medicines. www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/human/referrals/Flu... (accessed 24 January 2017).
EPOC 2015
-
- Effective Practice, Organisation of Care (EPOC). 23. Worksheets for preparing a Summary of Findings using GRADE. Resources for review authors, 2015. epoc.cochrane.org/epoc‐specific‐resources‐review‐authors (accessed 30 November 2016).
Fanelli 2017
Gan 2007
Grond 2004
Guyatt 2011
Guyatt 2013a
-
- Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Alonso‐Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2013;66:151‐7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006] - DOI - PubMed
Guyatt 2013b
Hadley 2013
Higgins 2011
-
- Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Hollingshead 2006
IARC 2012
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2012: estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx (accessed 21 November 2016).
L'Abbé 1987
Lintz 1998
-
- Lintz W, Barth H, Osterloh G, Schmidt‐Bothelt E. Pharmacokinetics of tramadol and bioavailability of enteral tramadol formulations. 3rd Communication: suppositories. Arzneimittel‐Forschung 1998;48(9):889‐99. [PUBMED: 9793614] - PubMed
Martindale 2016
-
- Brayfield A, editor. Tramadol hydrochloride. Martindale ‐ the complete drug reference (available at medicinescomplete.com) (accessed 21 November 2016). 8th Edition. London: Pharmaceutical Press, 2016.
McQuay 1998
-
- McQuay H, Moore A. An Evidence‐based Resource for Pain Relief. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. [ISBN: 0‐19‐263048‐2]
Mikan 2016
-
- Mikan F, Wada M, Yamada M, Takahashi A, Onishi H, Ishida M, et al. The association between pain and quality of life for patients with cancer in an outpatient clinic, an inpatient oncology ward, and inpatient palliative care units. American Journal of Hospital Palliative Care 2016;33(8):782‐90. [DOI: 10.1177/1049909116630266] - DOI - PubMed
Minami 2015
Moher 2009
Moore 1997
Moore 1998
Moore 2008
-
- Moore RA, Barden J, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Managing potential publication bias. In: McQuay HJ, Kalso E, Moore RA editor(s). Systematic Reviews in Pain Research: Methodology Refined. Seattle: IASP Press, 2008:15‐24. [ISBN: 978–0–931092–69–5]
Moore 2010
-
- Moore RA, Moore OA, Derry S, Peloso PM, Gammaitoni AR, Wang H. Responder analysis for pain relief and numbers needed to treat in a meta‐analysis of etoricoxib osteoarthritis trials: bridging a gap between clinical trials and clinical practice. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2010;69(2):374‐9. [DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.107805] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Moore 2013
Nguyen 2017
NICE 2016
-
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Palliative cancer care ‐ pain, 2016. cks.nice.org.uk/palliative‐cancer‐care‐pain (accessed 2 February 2017).
Nicholson 2017
Nüesch 2010
PaPaS 2012
-
- Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group. PaPaS author and referee guidance. papas.cochrane.org/papas‐documents (accessed 21 November 2016).
Pedersen 2005
Portenoy 1999
Prommer 2015
-
- Prommer EE. Pharmacological management of cancer‐related pain. Cancer Control 2015;22(4):412‐25. [PUBMED: 26678968] - PubMed
Radbruch 2013
Reeves 2008
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
-
- The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Schmidt‐Hansen 2015a
Schmidt‐Hansen 2015b
Scott 2000
Straube 2014
Thorlund 2011
Turner 2013
Twycross 2014
-
- Twycross R, Wilcock A, Howard P. Palliative Care Formulary. Nottingham: Palliativedrugs.com Ltd, 2014.
van den Beuken‐van Everdingen 2016
WHO 2016
-
- World Health Organization. WHO analgesic ladder. www.who.int/cancer/palliative/painladder/en/ (accessed 21 November 2016).
Wiffen 2013
Wiffen 2014
Wiffen 2015
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
