Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Jul 1:176:14-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 May 10.

Comparing adult cannabis treatment-seekers enrolled in a clinical trial with national samples of cannabis users in the United States

Erin A McClure  1 , Jacqueline S King  2 , Aimee Wahle  2 , Abigail G Matthews  2 , Susan C Sonne  3 , Michelle R Lofwall  4 , Aimee L McRae-Clark  3 , Udi E Ghitza  5 , Melissa Martinez  6 , Kasie Cloud  7 , Harvir S Virk  6 , Kevin M Gray  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing adult cannabis treatment-seekers enrolled in a clinical trial with national samples of cannabis users in the United States

Erin A McClure et al. Drug Alcohol Depend. .

Abstract

Background: Cannabis use rates are increasing among adults in the United States (US) while the perception of harm is declining. This may result in an increased prevalence of cannabis use disorder and the need for more clinical trials to evaluate efficacious treatment strategies. Clinical trials are the gold standard for evaluating treatment, yet study samples are rarely representative of the target population. This finding has not yet been established for cannabis treatment trials. This study compared demographic and cannabis use characteristics of a cannabis cessation clinical trial sample (run through National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network) with three nationally representative datasets from the US; 1) National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2) National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III, and 3) Treatment: Episodes Data Set - Admissions.

Methods: Comparisons were made between the clinical trial sample and appropriate cannabis using sub-samples from the national datasets, and propensity scores were calculated to determine the degree of similarity between samples.

Results: showed that the clinical trial sample was significantly different from all three national datasets, with the clinical trial sample having greater representation among older adults, African Americans, Hispanic/Latinos, adults with more education, non-tobacco users, and daily and almost daily cannabis users.

Conclusions: These results are consistent with previous studies of other substance use disorder populations and extend sample representation issues to a cannabis use disorder population. This illustrates the need to ensure representative samples within cannabis treatment clinical trials to improve the generalizability of promising findings.

Keywords: Cannabis; Cannabis use disorder; Clinical trial; Generalizability; Marijuana; Sample representativeness; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Berg CJ, Stratton E, Schauer GL, Lewis M, Wang Y, Windle M, Kegler M. Perceived harm, addictiveness, and social acceptability of tobacco products and marijuana among young adults: marijuana, hookah, and electronic cigarettes win. Subst. Use Misuse. 2015;50:79–89. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blanco C, Olfson M, Okuda M, Nunes EV, Liu SM, Hasin DS. Generalizability of clinical trials for alcohol dependence to community samples. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;98:123–128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brady JE, Li G. Trends in alcohol and other drugs detected in fatally injured drivers in the United States, 1999–2010. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2014;179:692–699. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Behavioral health trends in the United States: Results from the 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. SMA 15-4927, NSDUH Series H-50) 2015 http://www.samhsa.gov/data.accessed on June 23, 2016.
    1. Cochran WG, Rubin DB. Controlling Bias in Observational Studies: A Review. The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A (1961–2002) 1973;35:417–446.

Publication types

MeSH terms