Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Jul:214:109-114.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 4.

Local endometrial injury in women with failed IVF undergoing a repeat cycle: A randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Local endometrial injury in women with failed IVF undergoing a repeat cycle: A randomized controlled trial

Aleyamma Tk et al. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of local endometrial injury in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with at least one previous unsuccessful attempt.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial. Recruited women were randomized into two groups. In group A (pipelle group), women underwent pipelle biopsy twice in the luteal phase in the cycle prior to IVF. In group B (control), women did not undergo any intervention prior to IVF. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate. The secondary outcomes included live birth, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy and preterm delivery rates.

Results: One hundred and eleven women were included in the study with 55 in the pipelle group and 56 in the control arm. The baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. The clinical pregnancy rates were not significantly different between pipelle and control group (34.09% vs. 27.65%; Odds ratio, OR 1.35, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.55-3.30). The live birth (31.81% vs. 25.53%; OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.55-3.39), multiple pregnancy (33.33% vs. 61.54%; OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.07-1.47), miscarriage (6.66% vs. 7.69%; OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.05-15.23) and preterm delivery rates (35.71% vs. 66.66%; OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.05-1.4) were also not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusion: Current study did not find any improvement in IVF success rates following endometrial injury in woman undergoing IVF after previous failed attempt.

Keywords: Endometrial injury; IVF failure; Implantation rate; In vitro fertilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources