Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jul;38(7):513-525.
doi: 10.1016/j.it.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 May 13.

Mechanisms of Immune Tolerance in Leukemia and Lymphoma

Affiliations
Review

Mechanisms of Immune Tolerance in Leukemia and Lymphoma

Emily K Curran et al. Trends Immunol. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

The mechanisms through which immune responses are generated against solid cancers are well characterized and knowledge of the immune evasion pathways exploited by these malignancies has grown considerably. However, for hematological cancers, which develop and disseminate quite differently than solid tumors, the pathways that regulate immune activation or tolerance are less clear. Growing evidence suggests that, while numerous immune escape pathways are shared between hematological and solid malignancies, several unique pathways are exploited by leukemia and lymphoma. Below we discuss immune evasion mechanisms in leukemia and lymphoma, highlighting key differences from solid tumors. A more complete characterization of the mechanisms of immune tolerance in hematological malignancies is critical to inform the development of future immunotherapeutic approaches.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Unique and shared mechanisms of immune evasion in leukemia and lymphoma
Leukemias and lymphomas utilize many of the same mechanisms of immune evasion as solid tumors (top). These include induction of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) by interferon (IFN)-γ, downregulation of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I), inhibition of phagocytosis, and recruitment or induction of immunosuppressive cells such as tumor-associated macrophages (TAM), regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). However, several immune evasion mechanisms are unique to leukemia and lymphoma. In lymphoma (bottom left), genetic changes such as amplification of the PD-L1 locus on chromosome 9p24.1, or mutations, deletions or epigenetic silencing of the MHC II locus on chromosome 6 results in increased PD-L1 expression or loss of MHC class II (MHC II), respectively. In leukemia (bottom right), a relatively low mutational burden may result in fewer neoantigens available for recognition by host T cells. Further, danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) may not be present in concentrations sufficient to mediate dendritic cell (DC) maturation, and leukemia antigen presentation by immature DCs results in T cell tolerance. Teff, effector T cell; PD-1, programmed death-1.

References

    1. Dunn GP, et al. The three Es of cancer immunoediting. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:329–360. - PubMed
    1. Hodi FS, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:711–723. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robert C, et al. Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial. Lancet. 2014;384:1109–1117. - PubMed
    1. Topalian SL, et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2443–2454. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Younes A, et al. Nivolumab for classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma after failure of both autologous stem-cell transplantation and brentuximab vedotin: a multicentre, multicohort, single-arm phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1283–1294. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms