Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 16;7(1):1955.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02023-5.

Structure Based docking studies towards exploring potential anti-androgen activity of selected phytochemicals against Prostate Cancer

Affiliations

Structure Based docking studies towards exploring potential anti-androgen activity of selected phytochemicals against Prostate Cancer

Anshika N Singh et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common malignancy amongst men worldwide. Under PCa maintenance therapy drugs acting as antagonists/partial agonists of hormone receptors against the prostate tissue are used in clinical practices. Prominent drugs being Cyproterone acetate, Flutamide, Bicalutamide, they not only cause acute and long-term toxicity, but also develops drug resistance among patients. Our focus has been on phytochemicals which do not exhibit any cytotoxicity and have significant androgen receptor (AR) inhibition activity. As Protein- Ligand interactions play a key role in structure based drug design, so by using molecular docking, we screened 803 phytochemicals and investigated their binding affinity against AR. The three dimensional (3D) structure of AR was retrieved from Protein Data Bank, and docked with 3D Pubchem structures of 803 phytochemicals using Argus Lab. Molecular docking and drug likeness studies were made using ADMET properties while Lipinski's rule of five was performed for the phytochemicals to evaluate their anti-prostate cancer activity. The results showed that Isobavachin exhibited best binding affinity of -13.73 kcal/mol with AR followed by Glabranin, Anthocyanin and Eriosemation. Our studies therefore reveal that these four phytochemicals could be promising candidates for further evaluation for PCa prevention or management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphical representation of the different approaches used in this study.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2016;66:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Cancer Institute at National Institute of Health. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Prostate Cancer http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html (2015).
    1. Suzuki H, Ueda T, Ichikawa T, Ito H. Androgen receptor involvement in the progression of prostate cancer. Endocr. Relat Cancer. 2003;10:209–216. doi: 10.1677/erc.0.0100209. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tan MH, Li J, Xu HE, Melcher K, Yong EL. Androgen receptor: structure, role in prostate cancer and drug discovery. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2015;36:3–23. doi: 10.1038/aps.2014.18. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dehm SM, Tindall DJ. Molecular regulation of androgen action in prostate cancer. J. Cell Biochem. 2006;99:333–344. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20794. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms