Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 17;7(5):e012682.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012682.

Distribution and extent of electronic medical record utilisation in eye units across the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional study of the current landscape

Shin Bin Lim  1 , Humma Shahid  2
Affiliations

Distribution and extent of electronic medical record utilisation in eye units across the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional study of the current landscape

Shin Bin Lim et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Ophthalmology units across the UK vary widely in their adoption of electronic medical records (EMR). There is a lack of evidence to show the extent and progress of EMR adoption. The aim of this study was to capture a snapshot of the current landscape of EMR use, as a baseline for comparison in future studies.

Setting: An electronic survey questionnaire was sent to all NHS ophthalmology Units in the UK.

Participants: A total of 104 National Health Service (NHS) ophthalmology units participated in the survey, which was carried out over 6 months from December 2013 to June 2014.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Respondents were asked about technology usage pertaining to specific processes in the clinic workflow. This allowed us to determine the extent of EMR usage and details about current use or planned implementation by each unit.

Results: 77.6% (n=104) of NHS ophthalmology units responded. 45.3% (n=48) of units were currently using an EMR and a further 26.4% (n=28) of units plan to implement EMR within 2 years. 70.8% of units with a current EMR system use Medisoft. EMR is used by all clinicians in 37.5% and by all subspecialties offered at the unit in 27.0%. In 56.3%, new clinical notes are entered into EMR only by clinicians. All imaging devices are networked to EMR in 28.3%. In 46.7%, EMR is accessible by other specialties within the same hospital. 71.1% would recommend EMR to a colleague.

Conclusions: EMR has the potential to address current limitations of patient information transfer and sharing in ophthalmology. It is pleasing to see a significant proportion of units already engaging with EMR or having plans to do so in the near future. However, differing EMR systems and lack of remote access mean further optimisation of these record systems are needed to allow data transfer between units.

Keywords: electronic health records; electronic medical records; information technology; patient records.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of respondents and usage of EMR. EMR, electronic medical records.
Figure 2
Figure 2
EMR system used or planned for implementation. EMR, electronic medical records.
Figure 3
Figure 3
EMR usage by subspecialty. ‘Not applicable’ indicates that the subspecialty was not offered at the unit. EMR, electronic medical records.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Networking of imaging devices.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Respondents’ satisfaction with EMR. EMR, electronic medical records.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. A review of the potential benefits from the better use of information and technology in Health and Social Care: final report. London, 2013.
    1. Chiang MF, Boland MV, Margolis JW, et al. . Adoption and perceptions of electronic health record systems by ophthalmologists: an American Academy of Ophthalmology survey. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1591–7.10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.03.024 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Day AC, Donachie PH, Sparrow JM, et al. . The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 1, visual outcomes and complications. Eye 2015;29:552–60.10.1038/eye.2015.3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chiang MF, Boland MV, Brewer A, et al. . Special requirements for electronic health record systems in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1681–7.10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Department of Health. The National Programme for IT in the NHS: an update on the delivery of detailed care records systems, 2011.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources