Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 17;7(5):e013778.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013778.

Reducing social isolation and loneliness in older people: a systematic review protocol

Affiliations

Reducing social isolation and loneliness in older people: a systematic review protocol

Filipa Landeiro et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Social isolation and loneliness affect approximately one-third to one-half of the elderly population and have a negative impact on their physical and mental health. Group-based interventions where facilitators are well trained and where the elderly are actively engaged in their development seem to be more effective, but conclusions have been limited by weak study designs. We aim to conduct a systematic review to assess the effectiveness of health promotion interventions on social isolation or loneliness in older people.

Methods and analysis: A systematic review was conducted in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, LILACS, OpenGrey and the Cochrane Library on peer-reviewed studies and doctoral theses published between 1995 and 2016 evaluating the impact of health promotion interventions on social isolation and/or loneliness for individuals aged 60 and over. Two reviewers will independently assess each study for inclusion and disagreements will be resolved by a third reviewer. Data will be extracted using a predefined pro forma following best practice. Study quality will be assessed with the Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool. A narrative synthesis of all studies will be presented by type of outcome (social isolation or loneliness) and type of intervention. If feasible, the effectiveness data will be synthesised using appropriate statistical techniques.

Ethics and dissemination: This systematic review is exempt from ethics approval because the work is carried out on published documents. The findings of the review will be disseminated in a related peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. They will also contribute to a DPhil thesis.

Trial registration number: CRD42016039650.

Keywords: elderly; intervention; loneliness; older; social isolation; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. The World Health Organization. Active ageing: a policy framework. Madrid, Spain: WHO, 2002. - PubMed
    1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World population aging. New York: DESA, 2013.
    1. Ibrahim R, Abolfathi Momtaz Y, Hamid TA. Social isolation in older Malaysians: prevalence and risk factors. Psychogeriatrics 2013;13:71–9. 10.1111/psyg.12000 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grenade L, Boldy D. Social isolation and loneliness among older people: issues and future challenges in community and residential settings. Aust Health Rev 2008;32:468–78. 10.1071/AH080468 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Victor CR, Scambler SJ, Bowling ANN, et al. . The prevalence of, and risk factors for, loneliness in later life: a survey of older people in great Britain. Ageing Soc 2005;25:357–75. 10.1017/S0144686X04003332 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources