Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;61(4):332-337.
doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_517_16.

Comparison of Airtraq™, McCoy™ and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilisation: A randomised clinical trial

Vinod Hosalli  1 , B K Arjun  1 , Uday Ambi  1 , Shivanand Hulakund  1
Affiliations

Comparison of Airtraq™, McCoy™ and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilisation: A randomised clinical trial

Vinod Hosalli et al. Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background and aims: The study aimed at comparing the performance of the novel optical Airtraq™ laryngoscope with the McCoy™ and conventional Macintosh laryngoscopes for ease of endotracheal intubation in patients with neck immobilisation using manual inline axial cervical spine stabilisation (MIAS) technique.

Methods: Ninety consenting American Society of Anaesthesiologist's physical status I-II patients, aged 18-60 years, scheduled for various surgeries requiring tracheal intubation were randomly assigned into three groups of thirty each to undergo intubation with Macintosh, Airtraq™, or McCoy™ laryngoscope with neck immobilisation by MIAS technique. The ease of intubation based on Intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score, Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view, optimisation manoeuvres and impact on haemodynamic parameters were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA and Bonferroni correction for post hoc tests.

Results: All patients in three groups had a comparable demographic profile and were successfully intubated. The Airtraq™ laryngoscope significantly reduced the IDS (mean - 0.43 ± 0.81) as compared with both McCoy™ (mean - 1.63 ± 1.49, P = 0.001) and Macintosh laryngoscope (mean -2.23 ± 1.92, P < 0.001) and improved the Cormack-Lehane glottic view (77% grade 1 view and no patients with grade 3 or 4 view). There were less haemodynamic variations during laryngoscopy with the Airtraq™ compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope, but there was not between the Airtraq™ and McCoy™ laryngoscope groups.

Conclusion: In patients undergoing endotracheal intubation with cervical immobilisation, Airtraq™ laryngoscope was superior to the McCoy™ and Macintosh laryngoscopes, with greater ease of intubation and lower impact on haemodynamic variables.

Keywords: Airtraq™; Macintosh laryngoscope; McCoy™; airway management; cervical immobilisation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean heart rate changes (beats per minute) in response to laryngoscopy and intubation between (a) Airtraq™ and Macintosh group (b) Airtraq™ and McCoy™ group. The data are expressed as mean (SD)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean mean arterial pressure changes (mmHg) in response to laryngoscopy and intubation between (a) Airtraq™ and Macintosh group (b) Airtraq™ and McCoy™ group. The data are expressed as mean (SD)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Posner KL, Lee LA, Cheney FW. Management of the difficult airway: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:33–9. - PubMed
    1. Maharaj CH, O'Croinin D, Curley G, Harte BH, Laffey JG. A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: A randomised, controlled clinical trial. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:1093–9. - PubMed
    1. Tolon MA, Zanty OM, Shafshak W, Arida EE. Comparative study between the use of Macintosh laryngoscope and Airtraq in patients with cervical spine immobilisation. Alex J Med. 2012;48:179–85.
    1. McCoy EP, Mirakhur RK. The levering laryngoscope. Anaesthesia. 1993;48:516–9. - PubMed
    1. Uchida T, Hikawa Y, Saito Y, Yasuda K. The McCoy™ levering laryngoscope in patients with limited neck extension. Can J Anaesth. 1997;44:674–6. - PubMed