Cost-effectiveness evaluation of aspirin in primary prevention of myocardial infarction amongst males with average cardiovascular risk in Iran
- PMID: 28515767
- PMCID: PMC5385729
- DOI: 10.4103/1735-5362.202453
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of aspirin in primary prevention of myocardial infarction amongst males with average cardiovascular risk in Iran
Abstract
Aspirin is one of the certified medicines commonly used for the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI). Aspirin side effects and gastrointestinal bleeding, in particular, have arisen debates on its use for the primary prevention of MI. The present research evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the use of aspirin in the primary prevention of MI among Iranian men with average cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, using Markov modeling technique. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) estimated to be 864 USA dollars (USD) per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained and 782 USD per life years gained (LYG) for each patient in the base-case scenario (public tariffs and no discounting). This research proves cost-effectiveness of the use of aspirin in the primary prevention of MI in targeted population, since the assessed ICERs are quite under the recommended threshold by WHO which is one gross domestic product (GDP) per capita ($5315.1 for Iran in 2015).
Keywords: Aspirin; Cardiovascular diseases; Cost-effectiveness; Markov chain; Primary prevention.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of the Use of Clopidogrel and Pantoprazole in Comparison with Clopidogrel and Omeprazole for the Secondary Prevention of Myocardial Infarction in Iran.J Res Pharm Pract. 2021 Aug 3;10(2):90-95. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_21_22. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun. J Res Pharm Pract. 2021. PMID: 34527614 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of OTC use of simvastatin 10 mg for the primary prevention of myocardial infarction in Iranian men.Daru. 2015 Dec 30;23:56. doi: 10.1186/s40199-015-0129-2. Daru. 2015. PMID: 26717884 Free PMC article.
-
Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome After a 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis From China Payer's Perspective.Clin Ther. 2018 Dec;40(12):2125-2137. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Nov 22. Clin Ther. 2018. PMID: 30470579
-
Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Events After Myocardial Infarction: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 May;36(5):533-543. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0607-0. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018. PMID: 29344794 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clopidogrel: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(7):709-26. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624070-00009. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006. PMID: 16802846 Review.
Cited by
-
Decision-Analytical Modelling of Medicines in the Middle East: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluation Studies.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jul;23(4):569-612. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00940-x. Epub 2025 Apr 12. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025. PMID: 40221639
-
Polypill versus medication monotherapy in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases in Iran: An economic evaluation study.Health Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 5;7(7):e2240. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2240. eCollection 2024 Jul. Health Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38974330 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of the Use of Clopidogrel and Pantoprazole in Comparison with Clopidogrel and Omeprazole for the Secondary Prevention of Myocardial Infarction in Iran.J Res Pharm Pract. 2021 Aug 3;10(2):90-95. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_21_22. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun. J Res Pharm Pract. 2021. PMID: 34527614 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of type-2 diabetes screening in pharmacies in Iran.Res Pharm Sci. 2023 Jan 19;18(2):210-218. doi: 10.4103/1735-5362.367799. eCollection 2023 Apr. Res Pharm Sci. 2023. PMID: 36873274 Free PMC article.
-
Primary and secondary prevention interventions for cardiovascular disease in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review of economic evaluations.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Jun 14;16:22. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0108-9. eCollection 2018. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018. PMID: 29983644 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Murray CJL, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality & morbidity from diseases, injuries and risk factors in 1990 & projected to 2020. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1996. p. 1501.
-
- Beyranvand MR LA, Alipour Parsa S, Motamedi MR, Kolahi AA. The quality of life after first acute myocardial infarction. Pajohandeh. 2011;15(6):264–272.
-
- Salim Yusuf, Steven Hawken, Stephanie Ôunpuu, Tony Dans, Alvaro Avezum, Fernando Lanas, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364(9438):937–952. - PubMed
-
- Nichols M, Townsend N, Scarborough P, Rayner M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe 2014: epidemiological update. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2950–2959. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources