Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Apr;5(1):10-15.
doi: 10.14791/btrt.2017.5.1.10. Epub 2017 Apr 30.

Systematic Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Central Neurocytoma

Affiliations
Review

Systematic Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Central Neurocytoma

Timothy T Bui et al. Brain Tumor Res Treat. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Central neurocytoma (CN) typically presents as an intraventricular mass causing obstructive hydrocephalus. The first line of treatment is surgical resection with adjuvant conventional radiotherapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was proposed as an alternative therapy for CN because of its lower risk profile. The objective of this systematic analysis is to assess the efficacy of SRS for CN. A systematic analysis for CN treated with SRS was conducted in PubMed. Baseline patient characteristics and outcomes data were extracted. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed. Univariate and multivariate linear regressions were used to test for correlations to the primary outcome: local control (LC). The estimated cumulative rate of LC was 92.2% (95% confidence interval: 86.5-95.7%, p<0.001). Mean follow-up time was 62.4 months (range 3-149 months). Heterogeneity and publication bias were insignificant. The univariate linear regression models for both mean tumor volume and mean dose were significantly correlated with improved LC (p<0.001). Our data suggests that SRS may be an effective and safe therapy for CN. However, the rarity of CN still limits the efficacy of a quantitative analysis. Future multi-institutional, randomized trials of CN patients should be considered to further elucidate this therapy.

Keywords: Brain tumors; Gamma Knife radiosurgery; Linear accelerators; Neurocytoma, central; Stereotactic radiosurgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Flow chart of systematic search process.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Funnel plot of included studies showing asymmetry.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Forest plot quantitative analysis of included studies.CI, confidence interval.

References

    1. Hassoun J, Gambarelli D, Grisoli F, et al. Central neurocytoma. An electron-microscopic study of two cases. Acta Neuropathol. 1982;56:151–156. - PubMed
    1. Sharma MC, Deb P, Sharma S, Sarkar C. Neurocytoma: a comprehensive review. Neurosurg Rev. 2006;29:270–285. discussion 285. - PubMed
    1. Yang I, Ung N, Chung LK, et al. Clinical manifestations of central neurocytoma. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2015;26:5–10. - PubMed
    1. Choudhari KA, Kaliaperumal C, Jain A, et al. Central neurocytoma: a multi-disciplinary review. Br J Neurosurg. 2009;23:585–595. - PubMed
    1. Matsunaga S, Shuto T, Suenaga J, Inomori S, Fujino H. Gamma knife radiosurgery for central neurocytomas. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2010;50:107–112. disucussion 112-3. - PubMed