Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May;66(5):678-685.
doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000462. Epub 2017 May 18.

Effects of olanexidine gluconate on preoperative skin preparation: an experimental study in cynomolgus monkeys

Affiliations

Effects of olanexidine gluconate on preoperative skin preparation: an experimental study in cynomolgus monkeys

Hikaru Nakata et al. J Med Microbiol. 2017 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the bactericidal efficacy of a new topical antiseptic for preoperative skin preparation, olanexidine gluconate (development code: OPB-2045G), against transient or resident bacterial flora on the skin of cynomolgus monkeys.

Methodology: After measuring baseline bacterial counts on test sites marked on the abdomens, we applied olanexidine, chlorhexidine or povidone-iodine. After 10 min (fast-acting effect) and 6 h (long-lasting effect), bacterial counts were measured again and log10 reductions were calculated. In addition, we determined the bactericidal effects on the skin contaminated with blood before or after applying the antiseptics.

Results: In the non-blood-contaminated condition, the mean log10 reductions of olanexidine at doses of 1-2 % were significantly higher than those of saline (negative control), but did not significantly differ from those of 0.5 % chlorhexidine and 10 % povidone-iodine at either time point. But olanexidine was significantly more effective at both time points than chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine when applied after the site was contaminated with blood. Olanexidine was also significantly more effective than chlorhexidine and as effective as or more effective than povidone-iodine at both time points when skin was contaminated with blood after the antiseptics were applied.

Conclusion: The bactericidal effects of olanexidine were comparable to those of commercial antiseptics such as chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine in non-blood-contaminated conditions. More importantly, the effect of olanexidine was hardly affected by blood unlike commercial antiseptics. Thus, it is considered that olanexidine has a favourable property for skin preparation in various types of surgical treatments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This study was planned and led by the authors at Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc. The experiments were outsourced and conducted at Ina Research Inc. Hikaru Nakata, Yoshie Tsubotani, Takuya Nii, Akifumi Hagi, and Yasuhide Inoue are employees of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc. The company had no control over the interpretation, writing or publication of this study.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Chemical structure of olanexidine gluconate.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Changes in viable bacterial counts from baseline (white columns) to 10 min (black columns) and to 6 h (grey column) after antiseptic application against skin flora of cynomolgus monkeys in clean condition. Each column and vertical bar represents the mean and sd for eight test sites. Values not sharing a common letter at same time point differ significantly at P<0.05 by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Changes in viable bacterial counts from baseline (white column) to 10 min (black column) to 6 h (hatched column) after antiseptic application on the skin flora of cynomolgus monkeys in the contaminated condition; blood contamination before antiseptic applied (a) and blood contamination after antiseptic applied (b). Each column and vertical bar represents the mean and sd for eight test sites. Values not sharing a common letter at same time point differ significantly at P<0.05 by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zamora JL, Price MF, Chuang P, Gentry LO. Inhibition of povidone-iodine's bactericidal activity by common organic substances: an experimental study. Surgery. 1985;98:25–29. - PubMed
    1. Koburger T, Hübner NO, Braun M, Siebert J, Kramer A. Standardized comparison of antiseptic efficacy of triclosan, PVP-iodine, octenidine dihydrochloride, polyhexanide and chlorhexidine digluconate. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:1712–1719. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq212. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fuursted K, Hjort A, Knudsen L. Evaluation of bactericidal activity and lag of regrowth (postantibiotic effect) of five antiseptics on nine bacterial pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;40:221–226. doi: 10.1093/jac/40.2.221. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kobayashi H, Tsuzuki M, Hosobuchi K. Bactericidal effects of antiseptics and disinfectants against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1989;10:562–564. doi: 10.2307/30144238. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kampf G, Höfer M, Wendt C. Efficacy of hand disinfectants against vancomycin-resistant enterococci in vitro. J Hosp Infect. 1999;42:143–150. doi: 10.1053/jhin.1998.0559. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms