Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;19(4):703-709.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12496. Epub 2017 May 18.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of immediate and delayed placement of dental implants in molar and premolar regions

Affiliations

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of immediate and delayed placement of dental implants in molar and premolar regions

Joon-Kyu Kim et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine clinical and radiographic outcomes of immediate and delayed placement of dental implants in molar and premolar regions.

Materials and methods: Clinical and radiographic records of 116 patients who received implants in molar and premolar regions were included in this study. After implantation, patients were recalled for assessments at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and every year thereafter. In addition, anatomic location, type of prosthesis, gender, stage, diameter, and length of implants were analyzed.

Results: Of these 116 patients, 55 were males, and 61 were females. Their mean age was 50.9 years. They received 85 immediate implants and 147 delayed implants in molar and premolar regions. Gender, type of prosthesis, stage, implant diameter, and implant length were not significantly different between the immediate placement group and the delayed placement group, although anatomic locations were significantly different between the 2 groups. Their mean follow up time after dental implantation was 3 years (range, 6 months to 9 years). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates showed 97.8% probability of survival up to 9 years in the delayed placement group and 100% probability of survival up to 8 years in the immediate placement group. There was no significant difference in implant survival according to the time of implantation. No significant difference in cervical bone loss (CBL) at the mesial or distal side was found between the 2 groups. CBL according to anatomic location, the type of prosthesis, or gender was not significantly different either between the 2 groups. However, CBL at distal side of 1-stage approach was significantly (P < .05) smaller in the delayed placement group than that in the immediate placement group.

Conclusion: This study showed that immediate dental implantation in molar and premolar regions had good clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Keywords: cervical bone loss; immediate implantation; molar and premolar region.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources