Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 1;46(5):833-839.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx044.

Sources of unsafe primary care for older adults: a mixed-methods analysis of patient safety incident reports

Alison Cooper  1 , Adrian Edwards  1 , Huw Williams  1 , Huw P Evans  1 , Anthony Avery  2 , Peter Hibbert  3 , Meredith Makeham  3 , Aziz Sheikh  4   5 , Liam J Donaldson  6 , Andrew Carson-Stevens  1   3   7
Affiliations

Sources of unsafe primary care for older adults: a mixed-methods analysis of patient safety incident reports

Alison Cooper et al. Age Ageing. .

Abstract

Background: older adults are frequent users of primary healthcare services, but are at increased risk of healthcare-related harm in this setting.

Objectives: to describe the factors associated with actual or potential harm to patients aged 65 years and older, treated in primary care, to identify action to produce safer care.

Design and setting: a cross-sectional mixed-methods analysis of a national (England and Wales) database of patient safety incident reports from 2005 to 2013.

Subjects: 1,591 primary care patient safety incident reports regarding patients aged 65 years and older.

Methods: we developed a classification system for the analysis of patient safety incident reports to describe: the incident and preceding chain of incidents; other contributory factors; and patient harm outcome. We combined findings from exploratory descriptive and thematic analyses to identify key sources of unsafe care.

Results: the main sources of unsafe care in our weighted sample were due to: medication-related incidents e.g. prescribing, dispensing and administering (n = 486, 31%; 15% serious patient harm); communication-related incidents e.g. incomplete or non-transfer of information across care boundaries (n = 390, 25%; 12% serious patient harm); and clinical decision-making incidents which led to the most serious patient harm outcomes (n = 203, 13%; 41% serious patient harm).

Conclusion: priority areas for further research to determine the burden and preventability of unsafe primary care for older adults, include: the timely electronic tools for prescribing, dispensing and administering medication in the community; electronic transfer of information between healthcare settings; and, better clinical decision-making support and guidance.

Keywords: older adults; patient safety; primary care; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Driver diagram to show potential interventions to improve the safety of primary care for older adults.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Improving General Practice—A Call to Action https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/igp-cta-evid.pdf
    1. Panesar SS, Carson-Stevens A, Cresswell KM et al. . How safe is primary care? A systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 2016; 25: 544–53. - PubMed
    1. Tsang C, Bottle A, Majeed A, Aylin P. Adverse events recorded in English primary care: observational study using the General Practice Research Database. Br J Gen Pract 2013; 63: e534–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Avery AJ, Ghaleb M, Barber N et al. . The prevalence and nature of prescribing and monitoring errors in English general practice: a retrospective case note review. Br J Gen Pract 2013; 63: e543–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Wet C, Bowie P. The preliminary development and testing of a global trigger tool to detect error and patient harm in primary-care records. Postgrad Med J 2009; 85: 176–80. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms