Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1173-1183.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx047.

Asynchronous automated electronic laboratory result notifications: a systematic review

Benjamin H Slovis  1   2 , Thomas A Nahass  3 , Hojjat Salmasian  1   4 , Gilad Kuperman  1   5 , David K Vawdrey  1   4
Affiliations

Asynchronous automated electronic laboratory result notifications: a systematic review

Benjamin H Slovis et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the literature pertaining to asynchronous automated electronic notifications of laboratory results to clinicians.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Collaboration were queried for studies pertaining to automated electronic notifications of laboratory results. A title review was performed on the primary results, with a further abstract review and full review to produce the final set of included articles.

Results: The full review included 34 articles, representing 19 institutions. Of these, 19 reported implementation and design of systems, 11 reported quasi-experimental studies, 3 reported a randomized controlled trial, and 1 was a meta-analysis. Twenty-seven articles included alerts of critical results, while 5 focused on urgent notifications and 2 on elective notifications. There was considerable variability in clinical setting, system implementation, and results presented.

Conclusion: Several asynchronous automated electronic notification systems for laboratory results have been evaluated, most from >10 years ago. Further research on the effect of notifications on clinicians as well as the use of modern electronic health records and new methods of notification is warranted to determine their effects on workflow and clinical outcomes.

Keywords: alerts; automated; critical; laboratory; notifications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of article identification and review process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Sendelbach S, Funk M. Alarm fatigue: a patient safety concern. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2013;244:378–86; quiz 87–88. - PubMed
    1. Chopra V, McMahon LF Jr. Redesigning hospital alarms for patient safety: alarmed and potentially dangerous. JAMA. 2014;31112: 1199–200. - PubMed
    1. Schnall R, Liu N, Sperling J, Green R, Clark S, Vawdrey D. An electronic alert for HIV screening in the emergency department increases screening but not the diagnosis of HIV. Appl Clin Inform. 2014;51:299–312. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Green RA, Hripcsak G, Salmasian H et al. Intercepting wrong-patient orders in a computerized provider order entry system. Annals Emerg Med. 2015;656:679–86 e1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans RS, Johnson KV, Flint VB et al. Unit-wide notification of ventilator disconnections. Proc Annu AMIA Symp. 2005:951. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types