Medical students review of formative OSCE scores, checklists, and videos improves with student-faculty debriefing meetings
- PMID: 28521646
- PMCID: PMC5508650
- DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1324718
Medical students review of formative OSCE scores, checklists, and videos improves with student-faculty debriefing meetings
Abstract
Background: Performance feedback is considered essential to clinical skills development. Formative objective structured clinical exams (F-OSCEs) often include immediate feedback by standardized patients. Students can also be provided access to performance metrics including scores, checklists, and video recordings after the F-OSCE to supplement this feedback. How often students choose to review this data and how review impacts future performance has not been documented.
Objective: We suspect student review of F-OSCE performance data is variable. We hypothesize that students who review this data have better performance on subsequent F-OSCEs compared to those who do not. We also suspect that frequency of data review can be improved with faculty involvement in the form of student-faculty debriefing meetings.
Design: Simulation recording software tracks and time stamps student review of performance data. We investigated a cohort of first- and second-year medical students from the 2015-16 academic year. Basic descriptive statistics were used to characterize frequency of data review and a linear mixed-model analysis was used to determine relationships between data review and future F-OSCE performance.
Results: Students reviewed scores (64%), checklists (42%), and videos (28%) in decreasing frequency. Frequency of review of all metric and modalities improved when student-faculty debriefing meetings were conducted (p<.001). Among 92 first-year students, checklist review was associated with an improved performance on subsequent F-OSCEs (p = 0.038) by 1.07 percentage points on a scale of 0-100. Among 86 second year students, no review modality was associated with improved performance on subsequent F-OSCEs.
Conclusion: Medical students review F-OSCE checklists and video recordings less than 50% of the time when not prompted. Student-faculty debriefing meetings increased student data reviews. First-year student's review of checklists on F-OSCEs was associated with increases in performance on subsequent F-OSCEs, however this outcome was not observed among second-year students.
Keywords: OSCE; clinical skills; feedback; self-assessment; video review SP: Standardized patient.
Similar articles
-
Assessing Advanced Communication Skills via Objective Structured Clinical Examination: A Comparison of Faculty Versus Self, Peer, and Standardized Patient Assessors.Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jun-Jul;32(3):294-307. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1704763. Epub 2020 Mar 6. Teach Learn Med. 2020. PMID: 32141335
-
Comparison of student examiner to faculty examiner scoring and feedback in an OSCE.Med Educ. 2011 Feb;45(2):183-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03800.x. Epub 2010 Dec 17. Med Educ. 2011. PMID: 21166691
-
Optimizing the utility of communication OSCEs: omit station-specific checklists and provide students with narrative feedback.Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jul;88(1):106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.12.015. Epub 2012 Feb 10. Patient Educ Couns. 2012. PMID: 22322068
-
Changing an existing OSCE to a teaching tool: the making of a teaching OSCE.Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):932. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00036. Acad Med. 2002. PMID: 12228103 Review.
-
Should we video OSCEs for student appeals?Clin Teach. 2020 Apr;17(2):171-176. doi: 10.1111/tct.13062. Epub 2019 Aug 6. Clin Teach. 2020. PMID: 31386278 Review.
Cited by
-
'Early identification of struggling pre-clerkship learners using formative clinical skills OSCEs: an assessment for learning program.'.Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2028333. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2028333. Med Educ Online. 2022. PMID: 35048773 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of an obstetrics and gynecology interprofessional simulation-based education session for medical and nursing students.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22562. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022562. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 33120744 Free PMC article.
-
Medical Student Perceptions of Learner-Initiated Feedback Using a Mobile Web Application.J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2017 Dec 8;4:2382120517746384. doi: 10.1177/2382120517746384. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2017. PMID: 29349345 Free PMC article.
-
The 3-D Skills Model: a Randomised Controlled Pilot Study Comparing a Novel 1-1 Near-Peer Teaching Model to a Formative OSCE with Self-regulated Practice.Med Sci Educ. 2021 Sep 1;31(6):1789-1801. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01369-w. eCollection 2021 Dec. Med Sci Educ. 2021. PMID: 34950527 Free PMC article.
-
The value of quality feedback in formative OSCEs.Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1353877. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1353877. Med Educ Online. 2017. PMID: 28718345 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Romer C.. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev. 1993;100:363–5.
-
- Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79:S70–S81. - PubMed
-
- Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983;250:777–781. - PubMed
-
- Bernard AW, Gorgas D, Greenberger S, et al. The use of reflection in emergency medicine education. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(8):978–982. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources