Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May 18;14(1):28.
doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0154-1.

Supervised injection facilities in Canada: past, present, and future

Thomas Kerr  1   2 , Sanjana Mitra  3 , Mary Clare Kennedy  4   5 , Ryan McNeil  4   6
Affiliations
Review

Supervised injection facilities in Canada: past, present, and future

Thomas Kerr et al. Harm Reduct J. .

Abstract

Canada has long contended with harms arising from injection drug use. In response to epidemics of HIV infection and overdose in Vancouver in the mid-1990s, a range of actors advocated for the creation of supervised injection facilities (SIFs), and after several unsanctioned SIFs operated briefly and closed, Canada's first sanctioned SIF opened in 2003. However, while a large body of evidence highlights the successes of this SIF in reducing the health and social harms associated with injection drug use, extraordinary efforts were needed to preserve it, and continued activism by local people who inject drugs (PWID) and healthcare providers was needed to promote further innovation and address gaps in SIF service delivery. A growing acceptance of SIFs and increasing concern about overdose have since prompted a rapid escalation in efforts to establish SIFs in cities across Canada. While much progress has been made in that regard, there is a pressing need to create a more enabling environment for SIFs through amendment of federal legislation. Further innovation in SIF programming should also be encouraged through the creation of SIFs that accommodate assisted injecting, the inhalation of drugs. As well, peer-run, mobile, and hospital-based SIFs also constitute next steps needed to optimize the impact of this form of harm reduction intervention.

Keywords: Supervised injection facilities in Canada.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Small D. Fools rush in where angels fear to tread: playing God with Vancouver’s supervised injecting facility in the political borderland. Int J Drug Pol. 2007;18(1):18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.12.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wood E, Kerr T. What do you do when you hit rock bottom: responding to drugs in the City of Vancouver. Int J Drug Pol. 2006;17(2):55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.12.007. - DOI
    1. Small D, Palepu A, Tyndall M. The establishment of North America’s first state sanctioned supervised injection facility: a case study in culture change. Int J Drug Pol. 2006;17(2):73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.08.004. - DOI
    1. Broadhead RS, Kerr TH JPG, Altice FL. Safer injection facilities in North America: their place in public policy and health initiatives. J Drug Issues. 2002;32(1):329–55. doi: 10.1177/002204260203200113. - DOI
    1. Kerr T, MacPherson D, Wood E. Establishing North America’s first safer injection facility: lessons from the Vancouver experience. Brighton: Pavillion Publishing; 2008.

MeSH terms

Grants and funding