Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 19;17(1):361.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2307-z.

Influences on patient satisfaction in healthcare centers: a semi-quantitative study over 5 years

Ruth D Thornton  1 , Nicole Nurse  2 , Laura Snavely  3 , Stacey Hackett-Zahler  4 , Kenice Frank  5 , Robert A DiTomasso  6
Affiliations

Influences on patient satisfaction in healthcare centers: a semi-quantitative study over 5 years

Ruth D Thornton et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Knowledge of ambulatory patients' satisfaction with clinic visits help improve communication and delivery of healthcare. The goal was to examine patient satisfaction in a primary care setting, identify how selected patient and physician setting and characteristics affected satisfaction, and determine if feedback provided to medical directors over time impacted patient satisfaction.

Methods: A three-phase, semi-quantitative analysis was performed using anonymous, validated patient satisfaction surveys collected from 889 ambulatory outpatients in 6 healthcare centers over 5-years. Patients' responses to 21 questions were analyzed by principal components varimax rotated factor analysis. Three classifiable components emerged: Satisfaction with Physician, Availability/Convenience, and Orderly/Time. To study the effects of several independent variables (location of clinics, patients' and physicians' age, education level and duration at the clinic), data were subjected to multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA)..

Results: Changes in the healthcare centers over time were not significantly related to patient satisfaction. However, location of the center did affect satisfaction. Urban patients were more satisfied with their physicians than rural, and inner city patients were less satisfied than urban or rural on Availability/Convenience and less satisfied than urban patients on Orderly/Time. How long a patient attended a center most affected satisfaction, with patients attending >10 years more satisfied in all three components than those attending <1-5 years. Level of education affected patients' satisfaction only in the component Orderly/Time; patients without a high school education were significantly less satisfied than those with more. Patients in their 40's were significantly less satisfied in Availability/Convenience than those >60 years old. Patients were significantly more satisfied with their 30-40 year-old physicians compared with those over 60. On Orderly/Time, patients were more satisfied with physicians who were in their 50's than physicians >60.

Conclusions: Improvement in patient satisfaction includes a need for immediate, specific feedback. Although Medical Directors received feedback yearly, we found no significant changes in patient satisfaction over time. Our results suggest that, to increase satisfaction, patients with lower education, those who are sicker, and those who are new to the center likely would benefit from additional high quality interactions with their physicians.

Keywords: Community health; Health care delivery; Patient satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Satisfaction by location (Inner City, Urban and Rural). Lines/Brackets indicate comparisons by color that were significantly different in each of the categories
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Satisfaction by individual HCCs. Lines/Brackets indicate comparisons by color that were significantly different in each of the categories
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The effect of patient age on satisfaction. Lines/Brackets indicate comparisons by color that were significantly different in each of the categories
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The effect of patient education on satisfaction. Lines/Brackets indicate comparisons by color that were significantly different in each of the categories
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The effect of length of time at a HCC on satisfaction. Lines/Brackets indicate comparisons by color that were significantly different in each of the categories
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The effect of physician’s age on satisfaction. Lines/Brackets indicate comparisons by color that were significantly different in each of the categories
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Rider EA, Perrin JM. Performance profiles: the influence of patient satisfaction data on physicians’ practice. Pediatrics. 2002;109(5):752–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.752. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burroughs TE, Waterman BM, Gilin D, Adams D, McCollegan J, Cira J. Do on-site patient satisfaction surveys bias results? Jt Comm J Qual Pt Safety. 2005;31(3):158–66. - PubMed
    1. Jackson JL, Chamberlin J, Kroenke K. Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(4):609–20. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00164-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fan VS, Reiber GE, Diehr P, Burman M, McDonell MB, Fihn SD. Functional status and patient satisfaction: a comparison of ischemic heart disease, obstructive lung disease, and diabetes mellitus. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(5):452–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40057.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fan VS, Burman M, McDonell MB, Fihn SD. Continuity of care and other determinants of patient satisfaction with primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(3):226–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40135.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed