Comparison of spinal Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) planning techniques: intensity-modulated radiation therapy, modulated arc therapy, and helical tomotherapy
- PMID: 28526192
- DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.04.001
Comparison of spinal Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) planning techniques: intensity-modulated radiation therapy, modulated arc therapy, and helical tomotherapy
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers a highly conformal, hypofractionated radiation dose to a small target with minimal radiation applied to the surrounding areas. Therefore, using the proper treatment planning techniques for SBRT is important. Intensity modulation techniques, such as static intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), modulated arc therapy (mARC), and helical tomotherapy (HT), are useful for spinal SBRT because of a rapid dose fall-off and spinal cord avoidance. This study compared the planning characteristics for hypofractionated spinal SBRT administered using 3 treatment techniques. The factors evaluated for spinal SBRT planning were dose coverage, cord avoidance, target conformity, homogeneity, and dose spillage. Target coverage was 82.74% ± 3.35%, 80.92% ± 0.81%, and 85.01% ± 7.27% for IMRT, mARC, and HT, respectively. HT was therefore a powerful technique with respect to target coverage. The spinal cord dose for HT (mean, 1763.96 cGy; standard deviation [SD], 164.48) was significantly different from those for mARC (mean, 1991.75 cGy; SD, 248.00) and IMRT (mean, 2053.24 cGy; SD, 164.48). In addition, the partial spinal cord volume at 2000 cGy for HT (mean, 0.12 cc, SD, 0.01) was significantly different from those for IMRT and mARC (0.50 ± 0.10 cc and 0.56 ± 0.25 cc, respectively). The conformity index was 1.30 ± 0.12, 1.08 ± 0.05, and 1.36 ± 0.23 for IMRT, mARC, and HT planning, respectively. mARC showed the highest conformity (p = 0.000). HT used a narrow field fan beam and exhibited remarkable improvement of target coverage and cord dose, offering an important benefit to spinal SBRT. mARC had the highest target conformity and better high- and intermediate-dose spillage than HT and IMRT did, respectively. These planning techniques have different advantages. In the case of spine SBRT, HT should be used for cord avoidance. In some cases, such as for a short treatment duration when the patient is considered to be in a poor general condition, mARC can be used.
Keywords: Helical tomotherapy; Intensity-modulated radiation therapy; Modulated arc therapy; Spine; Stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Copyright © 2017 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Dosimetric evaluation of 4 different treatment modalities for curative-intent stereotactic body radiation therapy for isolated thoracic spinal metastases.Med Dosim. 2016 Summer;41(2):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2015.10.003. Epub 2016 Jan 28. Med Dosim. 2016. PMID: 26831753
-
Volumetric arc intensity-modulated therapy for spine body radiotherapy: comparison with static intensity-modulated treatment.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Dec 1;75(5):1596-604. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 Sep 3. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009. PMID: 19733447
-
Treatment plan quality and delivery accuracy assessments on 3 IMRT delivery methods of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine tumors.Med Dosim. 2019 Spring;44(1):11-14. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.12.009. Epub 2018 Feb 21. Med Dosim. 2019. PMID: 29429794
-
Emerging technologies in stereotactic body radiotherapy.Chin Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep;6(Suppl 2):S12. doi: 10.21037/cco.2017.06.19. Chin Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28917250 Review.
-
3D treatment planning on helical tomotherapy delivery system.Med Dosim. 2018 Summer;43(2):159-167. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Mar 23. Med Dosim. 2018. PMID: 29580934 Review.
Cited by
-
Treatment planning of VMAT and step-and-shoot IMRT delivery techniques for single fraction spine SBRT: An intercomparative dosimetric analysis and phantom-based quality assurance measurements.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jan;21(1):62-68. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12788. Epub 2019 Dec 10. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020. PMID: 31821729 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting vertebral compression fracture prior to spinal SBRT using radiomics from planning CT.Eur Spine J. 2024 Aug;33(8):3221-3229. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07963-3. Epub 2023 Oct 9. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 37814013
-
Repetitive Painting (REPEAT) Irradiation in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using Helical Tomotherapy.In Vivo. 2022 Jan-Feb;36(1):330-335. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12706. In Vivo. 2022. PMID: 34972730 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment planning for spinal radiosurgery : A competitive multiplatform benchmark challenge.Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Sep;194(9):843-854. doi: 10.1007/s00066-018-1314-2. Epub 2018 May 25. Strahlenther Onkol. 2018. PMID: 29802435 English.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources