Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Breast Is More Aggressive Than Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Study From a Single Institution and Review of Literature
- PMID: 28529029
- PMCID: PMC5537027
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.04.009
Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Breast Is More Aggressive Than Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Study From a Single Institution and Review of Literature
Abstract
Background: We aimed to describe our experience with metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC), evaluate its clinical outcome compared with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and provide a through and comprehensive review of the literature to date.
Materials and methods: We reviewed MBC cases (n = 46) from our institution. The following variables were recorded: tumor histologic subtype, Nottingham grade, tumor size, lymph node status, Tumor, Node, Metastases stage, biomarkers profile, patient's age and race, therapy modality (chemotherapy and radiation), and survival (disease-free survival [DFS] and overall survival [OS]). The clinical and pathological data for TNBC (n = 508) cases were extracted from the breast cancer database. To compare the survival between MBC and TNBC, a subgroup of MBC cases (n = 40) were matched with TNBC cases (n = 40) on the basis of known prognostic confounders.
Results: There were 17 of 46 (37%) cases with mesenchymal differentiation, 12 (26.1%) squamous cell carcinoma, 14 (30.4%) spindle cell carcinoma, and 3 (6.5%) mixed type. MBC presented at a more advanced stage than TNBC (P = .014) and was more likely to recur (34% vs. 15.5%; P = .004). More MBC patients died from disease than TNBC (29% vs. 16%; P = .05). In the multivariate analysis, MBC had approximately twice the risk of local recurrence than TNBC (95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.83; P = .05). MBC patients had worse DFS and OS than the matched TNBC patients (P < .001 and P = .033, respectively). A review of the literature comparing MBC versus TNBC is presented.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that MBC is clinically more aggressive than TNBC. Further studies might help delineate the differences between these 2 entities.
Keywords: Disease free survival; Metaplastic breast carcinoma; Overall survival; Survival metaplastic carcinoma versus triple negative breast carcinoma; Triple-negative breast carcinoma.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Reis-Filho JS, Lakhani SR, Gobbi H, Sneige N. Metaplastic Carcinoma. In: Lakhani S, Ellis I, Schnitt S, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Breast. 4. Lyon: IARC Press; 2012. pp. 48–52.
-
- Wargotz ES, Norris HJ. Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast: V. Metaplastic carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells. Hum Pathol. 1990;21(11):1142–50. - PubMed
-
- Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. Histological and molecular types of breast cancer: is there a unifying taxonomy? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009;6(12):718–30. - PubMed
-
- Jung SY, Kim HY, Nam BH, et al. Worse prognosis of metaplastic breast cancer patients than other patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;120:627–637. - PubMed
-
- Lai HW, Tseng LM, Chang TW, et al. The prognostic significance of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast (MCB) - a case controlled comparison study with infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Breast. 2013;22(5):968–973. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
