Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 5:8:149.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00149. eCollection 2017.

Determining the Association between Language and Cognitive Tests in Poststroke Aphasia

Kylie J Wall  1 , Toby B Cumming  2 , David A Copland  1
Affiliations

Determining the Association between Language and Cognitive Tests in Poststroke Aphasia

Kylie J Wall et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: Individuals with aphasia are often excluded from studies exploring poststroke cognition because so many of the standard cognitive assessments rely on language ability. Our primary objective was to examine the association between performance on cognitive tests and performance on comprehension and naming tests in poststroke aphasia. Second, we aimed to determine the association between language performance and a real-life measure of cognition (Kettle Test). Third, we explored the feasibility of administering cognitive tests in aphasia.

Methods: Thirty-six participants with poststroke aphasia and 32 controls were assessed on a battery of pen-and-paper cognitive tests recommended in stroke. Auditory comprehension was measured using the Comprehensive Aphasia Test and naming was measured using the Boston Naming Test. Twenty-two community dwelling participants with aphasia and controls were also asked to complete the Kettle Test. Multiple linear regressions were used to explore the relationship between language performance and performance on the cognitive tests. Feasibility was determined by quantifying missing data.

Results: The cognitive tests with the highest variance accounted for by auditory comprehension and naming were animal fluency (R2 = 0.67, R2 = 0.78) and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (recognition discrimination index) (R2 = 0.65, R2 = 0.78). All cognitive tests were significantly associated with auditory comprehension and naming, except for the Star Cancellation Test and the Kettle Test. Thirty-three percent of participants with aphasia were unable to complete all the cognitive tests.

Conclusion: Language and non-linguistic cognitive processes are often interrelated. Most pen-and-paper cognitive tests were significantly associated with both auditory comprehension and naming, even in tests that do not require a verbal response. Language performance was not significantly associated with a real-life cognitive performance measure. Task instructions, stimuli, and responses for completion need to be tailored for individuals with aphasia to minimize the influence of language deficits when testing non-linguistic cognitive performance.

Keywords: aphasia; cognition; cognitive impairments; neuropsychological tests; pen-and-paper tests; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number and frequency of missing data by cognitive tests in aphasia. *RDI, recognition discrimination index.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association between auditory comprehension and the cognitive tests (R2), with demographic factors included in the models. *RDI, recognition discrimination index.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Association between naming and the cognitive tests (R2), with demographic factors included in the models. *RDI, recognition discrimination index.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Engelter ST, Gostynski M, Papa S, Frei M, Born C, Ajdacic-Gross V, et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke (2006) 37(6):1379. 10.1161/01.STR.0000221815.64093.8c - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lambon Ralph MA, Snell C, Fillingham JK, Conroy P, Sage K. Predicting the outcome of anomia therapy for people with aphasia post CVA: both language and cognitive status are key predictors. Neuropsychol Rehabil (2010) 20(2):289–305. 10.1080/09602010903237875 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harnish SM, Lundine JP. Nonverbal working memory as a predictor of anomia treatment success. Am J Speech Lang Pathol (2015) 24(4):S880. 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0153 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray LL. Attention and other cognitive deficits in aphasia: presence and relation to language and communication measures. Am J Speech Lang Pathol (2012) 21(2):S51–64. 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0067) - DOI - PubMed
    1. van de Sandt-Koenderman WM, van Harskamp F, Duivenvoorden HJ, Remerie SC, van der Voort-Klees YA, Wielaert SM, et al. MAAS (multi-axial aphasia system): realistic goal setting in aphasia rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res (2008) 31(4):314–20. 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f23 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources