Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab add-on to standard-of-care therapy in patients with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma in a Brazilian healthcare setting
- PMID: 28532191
- DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1333513
Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab add-on to standard-of-care therapy in patients with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma in a Brazilian healthcare setting
Abstract
Objective: Omalizumab add-on to standard-of-care therapy has proven to be efficacious in severe asthma patients for whom exacerbations cannot be controlled otherwise. Moreover, evidence from different healthcare settings suggests reduced healthcare resource utilization with omalizumab. Based on these findings, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the addition of omalizumab to standard-of-care therapy in patients with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma in a Brazilian healthcare setting.
Methods: A previously published Markov model was adapted using Brazil-specific unit costs to compare the costs and outcomes of the addition of omalizumab to standard-of-care therapy vs standard-of-care therapy alone. Model inputs were largely based on the eXpeRience study. Costs and health outcomes were calculated for lifetime-years and were annually discounted at 5%. Both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.
Results: An additional cost of R$280,400 for 5.20 additional quality-adjusted life-years was estimated with the addition of omalizumab to standard-of-care therapy, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of R$53,890. One-way sensitivity analysis indicated that discount rates, standard-of-care therapy exacerbation rates, and exacerbation-related mortality rates had the largest impact on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.
Limitations: Assumptions of lifetime treatment adherence and rate of future exacerbations, independent of previous events, might affect the findings. The lack of Brazilian patients in the eXpeRience study may affect the findings, although sample size and baseline characteristics suggest that the modeled population closely resembles Brazilian severe allergic asthma patients.
Conclusion: Results indicate that omalizumab as an add-on therapy is more cost-effective than standard-of-care therapy alone for Brazilian patients with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma, based on the World Health Organization's cost-effectiveness threshold of up to 3-times the gross domestic product.
Keywords: Asthma; Brazil; Cost-effective; Costs; Omalizumab; Quality-adjusted life-years.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab for the treatment of inadequately controlled severe allergic asthma in Chinese children.J Asthma. 2020 Jan;57(1):87-94. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1544642. Epub 2018 Dec 3. J Asthma. 2020. PMID: 30507328
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Bronchial Thermoplasty, Omalizumab, and Standard Therapy for Moderate-to-Severe Allergic Asthma.PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0146003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146003. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26751790 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of omalizumab for uncontrolled allergic asthma in the Netherlands.J Med Econ. 2013;16(3):342-8. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.756398. Epub 2012 Dec 18. J Med Econ. 2013. PMID: 23216016
-
Omalizumab for the treatment of severe persistent allergic asthma in children aged 6-11 years.Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15 Suppl 1:13-21. doi: 10.3310/hta15suppl1/02. Health Technol Assess. 2011. PMID: 21609649 Review.
-
Omalizumab for the treatment of severe persistent allergic asthma in children aged 6-11 years: a NICE single technology appraisal.Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Nov 1;30(11):991-1004. doi: 10.2165/11597160-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012. PMID: 22950547 Review.
Cited by
-
Immunomodulators in chronic rhinosinusitis.World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Nov 10;4(3):186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2018.09.002. eCollection 2018 Sep. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018. PMID: 30506050 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Real-world effectiveness of omalizumab for severe allergic asthma treatment in Colombia.BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Nov 28;22(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02246-x. BMC Pulm Med. 2022. PMID: 36437461 Free PMC article.
-
Two decades with omalizumab: what we still have to learn.Biologics. 2018 Oct 26;12:135-142. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S180846. eCollection 2018. Biologics. 2018. PMID: 30464389 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of Yu-Ping-Feng powder for asthma in children: a protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(1):e18551. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018551. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 31895795 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Biological Asthma Treatments: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Economic Evaluations.Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Aug;36(8):957-971. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0658-x. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018. PMID: 29736895
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical