Challenges and strategies for implementing genomic services in diverse settings: experiences from the Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE (IGNITE) network
- PMID: 28532511
- PMCID: PMC5441047
- DOI: 10.1186/s12920-017-0273-2
Challenges and strategies for implementing genomic services in diverse settings: experiences from the Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE (IGNITE) network
Abstract
Background: To realize potential public health benefits from genetic and genomic innovations, understanding how best to implement the innovations into clinical care is important. The objective of this study was to synthesize data on challenges identified by six diverse projects that are part of a National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)-funded network focused on implementing genomics into practice and strategies to overcome these challenges.
Methods: We used a multiple-case study approach with each project considered as a case and qualitative methods to elicit and describe themes related to implementation challenges and strategies. We describe challenges and strategies in an implementation framework and typology to enable consistent definitions and cross-case comparisons. Strategies were linked to challenges based on expert review and shared themes.
Results: Three challenges were identified by all six projects, and strategies to address these challenges varied across the projects. One common challenge was to increase the relative priority of integrating genomics within the health system electronic health record (EHR). Four projects used data warehousing techniques to accomplish the integration. The second common challenge was to strengthen clinicians' knowledge and beliefs about genomic medicine. To overcome this challenge, all projects developed educational materials and conducted meetings and outreach focused on genomic education for clinicians. The third challenge was engaging patients in the genomic medicine projects. Strategies to overcome this challenge included use of mass media to spread the word, actively involving patients in implementation (e.g., a patient advisory board), and preparing patients to be active participants in their healthcare decisions.
Conclusions: This is the first collaborative evaluation focusing on the description of genomic medicine innovations implemented in multiple real-world clinical settings. Findings suggest that strategies to facilitate integration of genomic data within existing EHRs and educate stakeholders about the value of genomic services are considered important for effective implementation. Future work could build on these findings to evaluate which strategies are optimal under what conditions. This information will be useful for guiding translation of discoveries to clinical care, which, in turn, can provide data to inform continual improvement of genomic innovations and their applications.
Keywords: Electronic health record; Implementation; Patient engagement; Pharmacogenomics; Precision medicine; Provider engagement.
Similar articles
-
The IGNITE network: a model for genomic medicine implementation and research.BMC Med Genomics. 2016 Jan 5;9:1. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0162-5. BMC Med Genomics. 2016. PMID: 26729011 Free PMC article.
-
Lessons Learned When Introducing Pharmacogenomic Panel Testing into Clinical Practice.Value Health. 2017 Jan;20(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.08.727. Epub 2016 Oct 21. Value Health. 2017. PMID: 28212969 Free PMC article.
-
Implementing genomics and pharmacogenomics in the clinic: The National Human Genome Research Institute's genomic medicine portfolio.Atherosclerosis. 2016 Oct;253:225-236. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.08.034. Epub 2016 Aug 26. Atherosclerosis. 2016. PMID: 27612677 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Opportunities to implement a sustainable genomic medicine program: lessons learned from the IGNITE Network.Genet Med. 2019 Mar;21(3):743-747. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0080-y. Epub 2018 Jul 12. Genet Med. 2019. PMID: 29997387 Free PMC article.
-
Stakeholder engagement: a key component of integrating genomic information into electronic health records.Genet Med. 2013 Oct;15(10):792-801. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.127. Epub 2013 Sep 12. Genet Med. 2013. PMID: 24030437 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Exploring perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes regarding pharmacogenetic testing in the medically underserved.Front Genet. 2023 Jan 13;13:1085994. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1085994. eCollection 2022. Front Genet. 2023. PMID: 36712853 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and Facilitators to Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the United States: A Review.J Pers Med. 2019 Jul 1;9(3):32. doi: 10.3390/jpm9030032. J Pers Med. 2019. PMID: 31266140 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Next-generation nephrology: part 2-mainstreaming genomics in nephrology, a global perspective.Pediatr Nephrol. 2025 Sep;40(9):2779-2793. doi: 10.1007/s00467-025-06711-7. Epub 2025 Feb 28. Pediatr Nephrol. 2025. PMID: 40019555 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development of a Multifaceted Program for Pharmacogenetics Adoption at an Academic Medical Center: Practical Considerations and Lessons Learned.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Oct;116(4):914-931. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3402. Epub 2024 Aug 21. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024. PMID: 39169556 Free PMC article.
-
Development of Customizable Implementation Guides to Support Clinical Adoption of Pharmacogenomics: Experiences of the Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE (IGNITE) Network.Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2020 Jul 17;13:217-226. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S241599. eCollection 2020. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2020. PMID: 32765043 Free PMC article.
References
-
- The Precision Medicine Initiative (PMW) Working Group. The Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Program — Building a Research Foundation for 21st Century Medicine. September 17 2015. https://acd.od.nih.gov/reports/DRAFT-PMI-WG-Report-9-11-2015-508.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2017.
-
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine . Applying an implementation science approach to genomic medicine: workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2016. - PubMed
-
- Karlitz JJ, Hsieh M-C, Liu Y, Blanton C, Schmidt B, Jessup JM, et al. Population-based lynch syndrome screening by microsatellite instability in patients ≤50: prevalence, testing determinants, and result availability prior to colon surgery. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(7):948–955. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.417. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical