Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jul 5;372(1724):20160341.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0341.

How camouflage works

Affiliations
Review

How camouflage works

Sami Merilaita et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

For camouflage to succeed, an individual has to pass undetected, unrecognized or untargeted, and hence it is the processing of visual information that needs to be deceived. Camouflage is therefore an adaptation to the perception and cognitive mechanisms of another animal. Although this has been acknowledged for a long time, there has been no unitary account of the link between visual perception and camouflage. Viewing camouflage as a suite of adaptations to reduce the signal-to-noise ratio provides the necessary common framework. We review the main processes in visual perception and how animal camouflage exploits these. We connect the function of established camouflage mechanisms to the analysis of primitive features, edges, surfaces, characteristic features and objects (a standard hierarchy of processing in vision science). Compared to the commonly used research approach based on established camouflage mechanisms, we argue that our approach based on perceptual processes targeted by camouflage has several important benefits: specifically, it enables the formulation of more precise hypotheses and addresses questions that cannot even be identified when investigating camouflage only through the classic approach based on the patterns themselves. It also promotes a shift from the appearance to the mechanistic function of animal coloration.This article is part of the themed issue 'Animal coloration: production, perception, function and application'.

Keywords: animal coloration; crypsis; defensive coloration; signal-to-noise ratio; visual search.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have no competing interests.

References

    1. Poulton EB. 1890. The colours of animals: their meaning and use. Especially considered in the case of insects, 2nd edn London, UK: Kegan Paul, Trench Trübner & Co. Ltd.
    1. Thayer GH. 1909. Concealing-coloration in the animal kingdom: an exposition of the laws of disguise through color and pattern: being a summary of Abbott H. Thayer's discoveries. New York, NY: Macmillan.
    1. Cott HB. 1940. Adaptive coloration in animals. London, UK: Methuen & Co. Ltd.
    1. Osorio D, Cuthill IC. 2015. Camouflage and perceptual organization in the animal kingdom. In The Oxford handbook of perceptual organisation (ed. Wagemans J.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    1. Kelber A, Vorobyev M, Osorio D. 2003. Animal colour vision—behavioural tests and physiological concepts. Biol. Rev. 78, 81–118. (10.1017/S1464793102005985) - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources