Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;9(2):99-105.
doi: 10.5114/jcb.2017.67198. Epub 2017 Apr 13.

Parameters predicting for prostate specific antigen response rates at one year post low-dose-rate intraoperative prostate brachytherapy

Affiliations

Parameters predicting for prostate specific antigen response rates at one year post low-dose-rate intraoperative prostate brachytherapy

Kevin Martell et al. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a model for prostate specific antigen (PSA) values at one year among patients treated with intraoperatively planned 125I prostate brachytherapy (IOPB).

Material and methods: Four hundred and deven patients treated with IOPB for prostate adenocarcinoma were divided into four groups: those with PSA values ≥ 3 ng/ml; < 3 and ≥ 2; < 2 and ≥ 1 or PSA < 1 between 10.5 and 14.5 months post implantation (1yPSA). Ordinal regression analysis was then performed between patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. 1yPSA values were also compared with toxicity outcomes.

Results: Median 1yPSA was 0.77 (0.04-17.36). Thirty-two patients (8%) had a PSA ≥ 3; 35 (9%) had PSA < 3, ≥ 2; 87 (21%) had PSA < 2, ≥ 1, and most patients 254 (62%) had PSA < 1. PSA response was independent of gland volume, Gleason score, clinical stage, seed activity, V90, V200, D90, or number of needles and seeds used. Older patients had significantly lower 1yPSA; median ages 65.1 (46.5-81.0), 62.1 (50.4-79.5), 60.5 (47.1-80.3), and 58.1 (45.1-74.2) years for each of the 1yPSA groups respectively (p < 0.001). Also, both implant V150 (p < 0.001) and initial PSA values (p = 0.04) were predictive of 1yPSA values. There was no correlation between 1yPSA values and toxicity encountered.

Conclusions: PSA response at 1 year post IOPB appears to be dependent on patient age, initial PSA, and implant V150. Our results provide reassurance that parameters other than biochemical failure influence 1yPSA values.

Keywords: LDR; PSA; brachytherapy; prostate cancer; seeds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no other conflicts of interest or financial disclosures.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cumulative probability cross sections for 1yPSA groupings for varying A) age, B) initial PSA, and C) V150. Each plotted line represents the probability that a patient with the given variable characteristic (e.g., age 40 vs. 80) and static characteristics (e.g., initial PSA 5.8 and V150 of 76.6) will have a final PSA in the given ordinal group or any higher group. Hence, there is always a 100% probability that a patient will be in group one or higher. However, as seen in our example, there are 96% and 10% chances that the 40 and 80 year old’s will be in groups 2, 3, or 4. Hence, there are 4% and 90% chances of 40 and 80 year old’s having PSA < 1. Plot A) fixed PSA of 5.8 and V150 of 76.6. Plot B) fixed V150 of 76.6 and age of 63.3. Plot C) fixed initial PSA of 5.8 and age of 63.3
Fig 2
Fig 2
Time to PSA nadir < 0.2 ng/ml in months (from the time that the 1yPSA was measured) as a function of 1yPSA grouping. Patients with PSA at 1 year < 1 ng/ml had significantly shorter times to nadir than all other patient groups 60
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Linearized regression modeling of relationship between 1yPSA and time to meet A) PSA nadir of < 0.2 ng/ml, and B) PSA nadir of < 0.5 ng/ml. These times are in months and are from the time of measurement of the 1yPSA

References

    1. Marshall R, Buckstein M, Stone N, et al. Treatment outcomes and morbidity following definitive brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 20-year experience at Mount Sinai Medical Center. Urol Oncol. 2014;32:38.e1–7. - PubMed
    1. Kupelian P, Potters L, Khuntia D, et al. Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy < 72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy ≥ 72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seeds/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1-T2 prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phy. 2004;58:25–33. - PubMed
    1. Tran AT, Mandall P, Swindell R, et al. Biochemical outcomes for patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer treated with I-125 interstitial brachytherapy monotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2013;109:235–240. - PubMed
    1. Frank SJ, Levy LB, Van Vulpen M, et al. Outcomes after prostate brachytherapy are even better than predicted. Cancer. 2012;118:839–847. - PubMed
    1. Jabbari S, Weinberg VK, Shinohara K, et al. Equivalent biochemical control and improved prostate-specific antigen nadir after permanent prostate seed implant brachytherapy versus high-dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and high-dose conformal proton beam radiotherapy boost. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:36–42. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources