Parameters predicting for prostate specific antigen response rates at one year post low-dose-rate intraoperative prostate brachytherapy
- PMID: 28533796
- PMCID: PMC5437084
- DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2017.67198
Parameters predicting for prostate specific antigen response rates at one year post low-dose-rate intraoperative prostate brachytherapy
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a model for prostate specific antigen (PSA) values at one year among patients treated with intraoperatively planned 125I prostate brachytherapy (IOPB).
Material and methods: Four hundred and deven patients treated with IOPB for prostate adenocarcinoma were divided into four groups: those with PSA values ≥ 3 ng/ml; < 3 and ≥ 2; < 2 and ≥ 1 or PSA < 1 between 10.5 and 14.5 months post implantation (1yPSA). Ordinal regression analysis was then performed between patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. 1yPSA values were also compared with toxicity outcomes.
Results: Median 1yPSA was 0.77 (0.04-17.36). Thirty-two patients (8%) had a PSA ≥ 3; 35 (9%) had PSA < 3, ≥ 2; 87 (21%) had PSA < 2, ≥ 1, and most patients 254 (62%) had PSA < 1. PSA response was independent of gland volume, Gleason score, clinical stage, seed activity, V90, V200, D90, or number of needles and seeds used. Older patients had significantly lower 1yPSA; median ages 65.1 (46.5-81.0), 62.1 (50.4-79.5), 60.5 (47.1-80.3), and 58.1 (45.1-74.2) years for each of the 1yPSA groups respectively (p < 0.001). Also, both implant V150 (p < 0.001) and initial PSA values (p = 0.04) were predictive of 1yPSA values. There was no correlation between 1yPSA values and toxicity encountered.
Conclusions: PSA response at 1 year post IOPB appears to be dependent on patient age, initial PSA, and implant V150. Our results provide reassurance that parameters other than biochemical failure influence 1yPSA values.
Keywords: LDR; PSA; brachytherapy; prostate cancer; seeds.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no other conflicts of interest or financial disclosures.
Figures



References
-
- Marshall R, Buckstein M, Stone N, et al. Treatment outcomes and morbidity following definitive brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 20-year experience at Mount Sinai Medical Center. Urol Oncol. 2014;32:38.e1–7. - PubMed
-
- Kupelian P, Potters L, Khuntia D, et al. Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy < 72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy ≥ 72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seeds/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1-T2 prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phy. 2004;58:25–33. - PubMed
-
- Tran AT, Mandall P, Swindell R, et al. Biochemical outcomes for patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer treated with I-125 interstitial brachytherapy monotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2013;109:235–240. - PubMed
-
- Frank SJ, Levy LB, Van Vulpen M, et al. Outcomes after prostate brachytherapy are even better than predicted. Cancer. 2012;118:839–847. - PubMed
-
- Jabbari S, Weinberg VK, Shinohara K, et al. Equivalent biochemical control and improved prostate-specific antigen nadir after permanent prostate seed implant brachytherapy versus high-dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and high-dose conformal proton beam radiotherapy boost. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:36–42. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources