Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 1;185(11):1048-1050.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx077.

Invited Commentary: Selection Bias Without Colliders

Miguel A Hernán

Invited Commentary: Selection Bias Without Colliders

Miguel A Hernán. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

In causal analyses, conditioning on a collider generally results in selection bias. Conditioning on a prognostic factor that is independent of the exposure-and therefore is not a collider-can also result in selection bias when 1) the exposure has a non-null effect on the outcome and 2) the association between the noncollider and the outcome is heterogenous across levels of the exposure. This result was empirically demonstrated by Greenland in 1977 (Am J Epidemiol. 1977;106(3):184-187).

Keywords: causal diagrams; collider; loss to follow-up; selection bias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Causal directed acyclic graph off the null where E is exposure, D is disease, C is censoring, and U is the unmeasured common causes of C and D. The box around C indicates that the analysis is conditional on being uncensored.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Causal directed acyclic graph under the null where E is exposure, D is disease, C is censoring, and U is the unmeasured common causes of C and D. The box around C indicates that the analysis is conditional on being uncensored.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Greenland S. Response and follow-up bias in cohort studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1977;106(3):184–187. - PubMed
    1. Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology. 1999;10(1):37–48. - PubMed
    1. Hernán MA. Discussion on the paper by Keiding and Louis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2016;179(part 2):346–347.
    1. Pearl J. Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika. 1995;82(4):669–688.
    1. Greenland S, Pearl J. Adjustments and their consequences-collapsibility analysis using graphical models. Int Stat Rev. 2011;79(3):401–426.

Publication types